AVON, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: PENNY LANE PRINTING
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PENNY LANE PRINTING in 1471 ROUTE 15 P.O. BOX 340, AVON, NY 14414 (NAICS 323119). OSHA activity number 339110397.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PENNY LANE PRINTING
- Site address
- 1471 ROUTE 15 P.O. BOX 340
- City
- AVON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14414
- Mailing
- 1471 ROUTE 15 P.O. BOX 340, AVON, NY 14414
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323119
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: 1.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 213% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 96.2 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period. 2.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 198.5% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 95.7 dBA during the 431 monute sampling period. 3.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 190.7% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA during the 466 minute sampling period. 4.) Press room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 135.4% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92.9 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period. 5.) Binder room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 59.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA during the 326 minute sampling period. 6.) Binder Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 38.3% of the permissilb eexposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA during the 261 minute sampling period. The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels : 1.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 213% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 96.2 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period. 2.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 198.5% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 95.7 dBA during the 431 monute sampling period. 3.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 190.7% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA during the 466 minute sampling period. 4.) Press room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 135.4% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92.9 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period. 5.) Binder room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 59.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA during the 326 minute sampling period. 6.) Binder Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 38.3% of the permissilb eexposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA during the 261 minute sampling period. The employer had not conducted audiometric testing since 2010. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: 29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: 1.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 213% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 96.2 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period. 2.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 198.5% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 95.7 dBA during the 431 monute sampling period. 3.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 190.7% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA during the 466 minute sampling period. 4.) Press room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 135.4% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92.9 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period. 5.) Binder room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 59.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA during the 326 minute sampling period. 6.) Binder Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 38.3% of the permissilb eexposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA during the 261 minute sampling period. The employer did not develop and implement a training program. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Penny Lane Printing
View Penny Lane Printing's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323119)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339110397.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.