Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: PENNY LANE PRINTING

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PENNY LANE PRINTING in 1471 ROUTE 15 P.O. BOX 340, AVON, NY 14414 (NAICS 323119). OSHA activity number 339110397.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Penny Lane Printing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Penny Lane Printing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PENNY LANE PRINTING
Site address
1471 ROUTE 15 P.O. BOX 340
City
AVON
State
NY
ZIP
14414
Mailing
1471 ROUTE 15 P.O. BOX 340, AVON, NY 14414
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323119
Employees
100
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 19 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  1.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 213% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 96.2 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period.  2.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 198.5% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 95.7 dBA during the 431 monute sampling period.  3.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 190.7% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA during the 466 minute sampling period.  4.) Press room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 135.4% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92.9 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period.  5.) Binder room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 59.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA during the 326 minute sampling period.  6.) Binder Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 38.3% of the permissilb eexposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA during the 261 minute sampling period.  The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program.  NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.95 G06

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 19 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels :  1.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 213% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 96.2 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period.  2.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 198.5% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 95.7 dBA during the 431 monute sampling period.  3.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 190.7% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA during the 466 minute sampling period.  4.) Press room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 135.4% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92.9 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period.  5.) Binder room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 59.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA during the 326 minute sampling period.  6.) Binder Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 38.3% of the permissilb eexposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA during the 261 minute sampling period.  The employer had not conducted audiometric testing since 2010.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 19 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program:  29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  1.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 213% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 96.2 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period.  2.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Head Pressman was exposed to continuous noise at 198.5% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 95.7 dBA during the 431 monute sampling period.  3.) Press Room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 190.7% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA during the 466 minute sampling period.  4.) Press room - On or about 6/13/13, a 'Flyer' was exposed to continuous noise at 135.4% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92.9 dBA during the 430 minute sampling period.  5.) Binder room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 59.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA during the 326 minute sampling period.  6.) Binder Room - On or about 6/13/13, a Binder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at 38.3% of the permissilb eexposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA during the 261 minute sampling period.  The employer did not develop and implement a training program.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Penny Lane Printing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339110397.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.