MEQUON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: SOLAIS SIDING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SOLAIS SIDING in 7080 W. CONCORD CREEK DR., MEQUON, WI 53092 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339119646.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOLAIS SIDING
- Site address
- 7080 W. CONCORD CREEK DR.
- City
- MEQUON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53092
- Mailing
- 8325 FOX HAVEN CHASE, STURTEVANT, WI 53177
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Solais Siding, did not provide certification on the cited item: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees who were exposed to fall hazards had been properly trained to recognize and minimize those hazards as related to their work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $400
- — Z (O) $400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting siding work on a residential building. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employee(s) were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting siding work on a residential building. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: (a) The employer did not ensure that a ladder used for access and egress was at least 3' above the landing surface for employees who were engaged in siding work on a residential building. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: (a) The employer did not ensure that a step ladder was used in the open position while an employee was engaged in siding work on a residential building. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level: (a) The employer did not ensure that a stepladder was used on a level surface. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Solais Siding
View Solais Siding's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339119646.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.