Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPENDRUP FAN COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPENDRUP FAN COMPANY in 2768 C 1/2 ROAD, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502 (NAICS 333413). OSHA activity number 339147019.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spendrup FAN Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spendrup FAN Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2768 C 1/2 ROAD
City
GRAND JUNCTION
State
CO
ZIP
81502
Mailing
P.O. BOX 4308, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333413
Employees
43
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Abate by
Jan 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to "stuck by" hazards associated with machinery setup.     (a) Spendrup Fan Company @ 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 25th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the operator of the Knuth R60 boring machine had been instructed and understood how to safely set up and align the machine with the material being drilled (fan hubs).  The operator engaged in setting up the boring machine to drill multiple 5 inch holes through fan hubs was observed hand-gripping the rotating spindle to slow its rotation. The condition exposed the employee to hand/knuckle injuries associated with the rotating spindle.     Among other feasible and acceptable methods to abate this hazard is to follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.8-2001 document titled "Safety Requirements for Manual Milling, Drilling and Boring Machines with or without Automatic Control". Paragraph 4.3(i) states the following. "Never slow or stop the spindle or workpiece by hand-gripping of the spindle, workholding device or the workpiece; likewise, never use an improvised breaking device (e.g., pry-bar)".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1249.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     (a) Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO:  On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the rotating spindle-chuck assembly on the Knuth R60 boring machine was guarded to prevent accidental contact.    (b)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the rotating spindle-chuck assembly on the Progress I-550 turret lathe was guarded to prevent accidental contact.    (c)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the rotating spindle-chuck assembly on the McDougall turret lathe was guarded to prevent accidental contact.     (d)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the rotating spindle-chuck assembly on the LeBlond turret lathe was guarded to prevent accidental contact.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.219 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):     (a)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the guard on the McDougall turret lathe completely enclosed the power transmission pulleys.  The condition exposed employees to accidental contact with the in-running nip point between the belt and pulley.     (b)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO:On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the guard on the Progress I-550 turret lathe completely enclosed the power transmission pulleys. Condition exposed employees to accidental contact with the in-running nip point between the belt and pulley.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.219 E03 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):     (a)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: The employer did not ensure the guard on the McDougall turret lathe completely enclosed the incline belts.  The condition exposed employees to accidental contact with the in-running nip point between the belt and pulley.    (b)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure the guard on the Progress I-550 turret lathe completely enclosed the incline belts.  The condition exposed employees to accidental contact with the in-running nip point between the belt and pulley.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Other-than-serious 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:     (a)Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer did not ensure an adequate number of welding screens were placed around each welding work station to prevent employees walking down the main aisle. The condition exposed employees to flash burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1249.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:   (a) 29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO:  On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer had not developed and implemented an educational program to familiarize employees working in the fabrication areas with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and hazards involved with incipient stage fires.  Abatement Note: Per OSHA regulation 1910.157(g)(2), the employer shall provide the above training upon initial assignment to the designated employee(s) and at least annually thereafter.  Abatement Note: OSHA Subpart Q, section 1010.252(a)(2)(iii) titled Welding, Cutting and Brazing require all fire extinguishers to be maintained in a state of rediness for instant use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.184 E03 II

Other-than-serious 5 instances 40 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(ii): Records of the most recent month in which each alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly inspected were not available for examination:   (a)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO:  On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer had not developed and maintained inspection records indicating that all alloy steel chain slings used for hoisting were thoroughly inspected at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   (a)  Spendrup Fan Company, 2768 C ½ Road, Grand Junction, CO: On and before June 24th, 2013, the employer had not developed a written hazard communication program to include chemicals used in the spray finishing of industrial fans manufactured by the employer. The employer uses paint and solvents containing Isocyanates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Spendrup FAN Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339147019.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.