Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CLEAR CREEK INDUSTRIES INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLEAR CREEK INDUSTRIES INC in 85 STOCKPOLE ST., SAINT MARYS, PA 15857 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339151169.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Clear Creek Industries INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Clear Creek Industries INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
85 STOCKPOLE ST.
City
SAINT MARYS
State
PA
ZIP
15857
Mailing
85 STOCKPOLE ST., SAINT MARYS, PA 15857
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of every workroom was not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:    a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., throughout the production areas.  On or about June 27, 2013, the floor of the production area was not maintained in a clean and dry condition in that, water and coolant from the machines remained on the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $875
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:    a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., OMNI lathes.  On or about June 27, 2013, employees were not protected from the coolant that was being sprayed by the machines through the use of adequate personal protective equipment, shields and/or barriers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $875
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., throughout the facility.  On or about June 27, 2013, a written certification was not available to verify that a workplace personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury:    a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., throughout the production area.  On or about June 27, 2013, an energy control program (lockout/tagout program) consisting of documented procedures, training, inspections/audits and lockout hardware had not been developed.  Employees performed servicing and maintenance on machines including, but not limited to, the OMNI lathes and the Haas CNC lathe.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $875
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $875 Reduced
1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely through successful completion of training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l):    a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., throughout facility.  On or about June 27, 2013, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator had received forklift training and an evaluation.  Personnel operated forklifts including, but not limited to the Hyster forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $875
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by rotating parts and flying chips:    a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., OMNI lathes.  On or about June 27, 2013, machine operators were not protected from flying metal chips coming from the machines.    b) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., back of OMNI lathes.  On or about June 27, 2013, the rotating parts on the side of the machines were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $875
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation guarding device was not in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, was not so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:     a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., OMNI lathe.  On or about June 27, 2013, the two hand operation buttons were inadequately designed in that they could be defeated by the operator.  The operator could operate the machine by depressing one button and defeating the second button while holding the part in the danger zone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $875
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable extinguishers were not visually inspected monthly:  a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., throughout facility.  On or about June 27, 2013, the portable fire extinguishers were not inspected monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers are subjected to an annual maintenance check:    a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., throughout facility.  On or about June 27, 2013, the portable fire extinguishers had not received an annual maintenance check for more than two years or since January, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc., behind OMNI lathes.  On or about June 27, 2013, extension cords were used in lieu of permanant wiring to supply power to the machines.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Clear Creek Industries INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339151169.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.