SAINT MARYS, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: CLEAR CREEK INDUSTRIES INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CLEAR CREEK INDUSTRIES INC in 85 STOCKPOLE ST., SAINT MARYS, PA 15857 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339158321.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLEAR CREEK INDUSTRIES INC
- Site address
- 85 STOCKPOLE ST.
- City
- SAINT MARYS
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15857
- Mailing
- 85 STOCKPOLE ST., SAINT MARYS, PA 15857
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $750 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc - Company had not developed and implemented a comprehensive hearing conservation program. On or about August 7, 2013, the following noise exposures were measured: 1. A supervisor was exposed to a mixed noise level of 87.1 dBA or an equivalent dose of 66.9, as an 8-hour TWA, while performing numerous duties throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc - Company did not develop and implement a noise monitioring program for employees exposed to noise above the action level. On or about August 7, 2013, the following noise exposures were measured: 1. A supervisor was exposed to a mixed noise level of 87.1 dBA or an equivalent dose of 66.9, as an 8-hour TWA, while performing numerous duties throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc - Company did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for employees exposed to noise above the action level. On or about August 7, 2013, the following noise exposures were measured: 1. A supervisor was exposed to a mixed noise level of 87.1 dBA or an equivalent dose of 66.9, as an 8-hour TWA, while performing numerous duties throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 I03
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc - On or about June 6, 2013 and August 7, 2013 only a single type of hearing protector was available for use. On or about August 7, 2013, the following noise exposures were measured: 1. A supervisor was exposed to a mixed noise level of 87.1 dBA or an equivalent dose of 66.9, as an 8-hour TWA, while performing numerous duties throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc -Company did not provide hearing conservation training for employees exposed to noise above the action level. On or about August 7, 2013, the following noise exposures were measured: 1. A supervisor was exposed to a mixed noise level of 87.1 dBA or an equivalent dose of 66.9, as an 8-hour TWA, while performing numerous duties throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 L01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): The employer did not make available to affected employees or their representatives copies of 29 CFR 1910.95 and did not post a copy in the workplace: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc -A copy of CFR 1910.95 was not made available to employees exposed to noise above the action level. On or about August 7, 2013, the following noise exposures were measured: 1. A supervisor was exposed to a mixed noise level of 87.1 dBA or an equivalent dose of 66.9, as an 8-hour TWA, while performing numerous duties throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.141 A03 I
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed a.) Clear Creek Industries, Inc.- Company failed to ensure toilets were maintained in sanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.141 D01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(1): Washing facilities were not maintained in a sanitary condition: a.) Clear Creek Industries, Inc.- Company failed to ensure sinks, located in the bathroom, were maintained in sanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $750 Reduced
05605010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a.) Clear Creek Industries, Inc- On or about June 27, 2013 and at times prior there to, employees worked with and around various types of hazardous chemicals and substances including, but not limited to, carbon monoxide and oil mist during production operations. Employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
05605010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a.) Clear Creek Industries, Inc- employees work with and around various types of hazardous chemicals and substances including, but not limited to, carbon monoxide and oil mist during production operations. On or about June 27, 2013, company had not provided employees with information and training about hazardous chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.141 A05
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5): Enclosed workplaces were not so constructed, equipped, and maintained as to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, or other vermin: a) Clear Creek Industries, Inc- On or about June 27, 2013, dead birds were observed on the second floor of the facility. Company did not ensure the workplace was so constructed as to prevent the entrance or harbonage or birds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Clear Creek Industries INC
View Clear Creek Industries INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339158321.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.