APPLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MOISES MARTINEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MOISES MARTINEZ in 332 S LOCUST STREET, APPLETON, WI 54914 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339162109.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MOISES MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 332 S LOCUST STREET
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54914
- Mailing
- 3125 W 4TH STREET APT B, APPLETON, WI 54914
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Employees who were installing shingles were operating pneumatic nail guns without wearing eye protection. Abatement Certification required
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a Employees were working on a roof with a 6:12 pitch and an eave edge greater than eighteen (18) feet above a steel trash trailer and compacted surface without utilizing fall protection equipment. b Employees who were accessing the roof of a ground level entrance were climbing over a handrail within three feet of the roof edge at a height greater than ten (10) feet without any fall protection. Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation required
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02 III
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used: Employer did not provide employee fall protection safety training for employees who did not associate fall from elevation hazards while working from a roof surface greater than eighteen (18) feet above surface level without utilizing fall protection equipment. Abatement Certification required
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Moises Martinez
View Moises Martinez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339162109.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.