Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: YANK WASTE CO., INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of YANK WASTE CO., INC. in 112 KARNER ROAD, ALBANY, NY 12212 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 339166621.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Yank Waste CO., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Yank Waste CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
112 KARNER ROAD
City
ALBANY
State
NY
ZIP
12212
Mailing
PO BOX 12024, ALBANY, NY 12212
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
18
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subject to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized:      (a) On or about July 8, 2013, in the front room, for an employee watching the operation and activating the baler, to shred paper that was exposed to a dose of 214% measured on a 80 dBA threshold dosimeter. The equivalent sound level is 95 dBA. Sampling was conducted for 355 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 125 minutes to total 480 minutes. Feasible administrative and engineering controls included but were not limited developing a schedule of rotation for this position and moving the employer as far away from the auger as possible, after evaluating all safety concerns, by extending the cord on the activation button.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.95 G06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels :   (a) On or about July 8, 2013, in the front room, for an employee watching the operation and activating the baler, to shred paper that was exposed to a dose of 214% measured on a 80 dBA threshold dosimeter. The equivalent sound level is 95 dBA. Sampling was conducted for 355 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 125 minutes to total 480 minutes. This employee was last administered an audiometric test on November 30, 2010.  (b) On or about July 8, 2013, in the front room, for an employee identified as the baler man was exposed to a dose of 65.2% measured on a 80 dBA threshold dosimeter. The equivalent sound level is 86.9 dBA. Sampling was conducted for 351 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 129 minutes to total 480 minutes. This employee was last administered an audiometric test on November 30, 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.95 K02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program. Information in the training program was not updated to be consistent with changes in protective equipment and work processes:  (a) On or about July 8, 2013, in the front room, for an employee watching the operation and activating the baler, to shred paper that was exposed to a dose of 214% measured on a 80 dBA threshold dosimeter. The equivalent sound level is 95 dBA. Sampling was conducted for 355 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 125 minutes to total 480 minutes.   (b) On or about July 8, 2013, in the front room, for an employee identified as the baler man was exposed to a dose of 65.2% measured on a 80 dBA threshold dosimeter. The equivalent sound level is 86.9 dBA. Sampling was conducted for 351 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 129 minutes to total 480 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1020 G01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(i): Upon an employee's first entering into employment, and at least annually thereafter, each employer did not inform current employees of the existence, location and availability of any records covered by this section:  (a) On or about July 8, 2013, in the facility, for the audiometric test records maintained by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1020 G01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(i): Upon an employee's first entering into employment, and at least annually thereafter, each employer did not inform current employees of the person responsible for maintaining and providing access to these records:  (a) On or about July 8, 2013, in the facility, for the audiometric test records maintained by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1020 G01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(iii): Upon an employee's first entering into employment, and at least annually thereafter, each employer did not inform current employees of each employee's rights of access to these records:  (a) On or about July 8, 2013, in the facility, for the audiometric test records maintained by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Yank Waste CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339166621.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.