Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROGELIO GONZALEZ-FLORES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROGELIO GONZALEZ-FLORES in 1231 S. 7TH ST, MANITOWOC, WI 54220 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339195034.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rogelio Gonzalez-Flores — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rogelio Gonzalez-Flores is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1231 S. 7TH ST
City
MANITOWOC
State
WI
ZIP
54220
Mailing
165B FORREST ST., WELLFORD, SC 29385
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On 7/15/13 employees were reroofing a two story house without adequate fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On 7/15/13, two extension ladders used to access the roof did not extend at least 3' above the eave edge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:    On 7/15/13, an aluminum extension ladder was separated into two pieces and both parts were used to access the roof in separate areas.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladder(s) with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately:  The Louisville fiberglass extension ladder used to access the roof had broken side rails.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):   On and before 7/15/13 employees performing roofing work had not been trained to identify and prevent fall hazards by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 10 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): 1926.1060(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards.  On and before 7/15/13, employees had not been trained by a competent person to recognize and avoid hazards related to improper use of ladders and the use of damaged ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Rogelio Gonzalez-Flores's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339195034.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.