Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROGELIO GONZALEZ-FLORES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROGELIO GONZALEZ-FLORES in 630 S.35TH ST., MANITOWOC, WI 54220 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339238347.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rogelio Gonzalez-Flores — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rogelio Gonzalez-Flores is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
630 S.35TH ST.
City
MANITOWOC
State
WI
ZIP
54220
Mailing
165B FORREST ST., WELLFORD, SC 29385
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  a) On and before 7/30/13, employees had not been trained to recognize hazards relating to roofing work or the methods to prevent those hazards by proper use of ladders, tools and personal protective equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. :  a) On 7/30/13, employees performing roofing work were not wearing or provided with safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  - a) On 7/30/13, employees reroofing a 1- 1/2 story steep pitch house were not protected from falls due to improperly installed personal fall arrest systems and harnesses not being connected to lifelines.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) On and before 7/30/13, employees had not been trained by a competent person to properly set up, wear or use personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:   a) On 7/30/13, an employee climbing an extension ladder while carrying a bundle of shingles was not able to hang on to the ladder with one hand at all times.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:   a) On 7/30/13, an employee was carrying bundles of shingles up the ladder to the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.:  a) On and before 7/30/13, employees had not been trained by a competent person to properly inspect, set up, and use ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Rogelio Gonzalez-Flores's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339238347.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.