Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARGARITO RAMIREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARGARITO RAMIREZ in 1309 TWISTING MEADOWS DRIVE, HASLET, TX 76052 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339201535.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Margarito Ramirez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Margarito Ramirez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARGARITO RAMIREZ
Site address
1309 TWISTING MEADOWS DRIVE
City
HASLET
State
TX
ZIP
76052
Mailing
4428 DIAZ ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2): A respirator was not provided by the employer to each employee when such equipment was necessary to protect the health of the employee: (as referenced in 1926.103)   On or about July 02, 2013, employees performing masonry activities were exposed to respiratory hazards.  a) An employee operated a DeWalt circular saw to cut bricks without a respirator.  b) An employee operated a DeWalt handheld grinder to cut stone without a respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   On or about July 02, 2013, employees performing masonry activities were tossing bricks from the ground level to the first tier of a scaffold. The employees worked without protective helmets and were exposed to head injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   On or about July 02, 2013, employees performing masornry activities were cutting brinks and stone without eye and face protection exposing the employees to eye and face hazards.   a) An employee operated a DeWalt circular saw to cut bricks. b) An employee operated a DeWalt handheld grinder to cut stone.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:   On or about July 02, 2013 employees performing masonry activities were operating a circular saw with the guard tied back to the handle rendering the guard inoperable. The employees were exposed to to amputation hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   On or about July 02, 2013, employees required to operate a circular saw utilized a flexible extension cord that did not have a strain relief device exposing the employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    On or about July 02, 2013, employees were observed working from the first tier of a tubular welded scaffold that was not fully planked, exposing employees to fall hazards greater than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.   On or about July 02, 2013, a ladder was not provided for employee use to access the higher levels of the scaffold, exposing employees to falls of up to approximately 12 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    On or about July 02, 2013, employees who erected a welded frame scaffold were not directed by a competent person in scaffold erection. The employees worked from the scaffold that was not fully planked, with no means of egress and were exposed to an unprotected fall of over 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level.   On or about July 02, 2013, employees performing masonry activities from the second level of a tubular welded frame scaffold were not protected from falling more than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Margarito Ramirez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339201535.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.