HANOVER, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: BOSTON BOWL HANOVER, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BOSTON BOWL HANOVER, INC. in 58 ROCKLAND STREET, HANOVER, MA 02339 (NAICS 713950). OSHA activity number 339210569.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOSTON BOWL HANOVER, INC.
- Site address
- 58 ROCKLAND STREET
- City
- HANOVER
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02339
- Mailing
- 58 ROCKLAND STREET, HANOVER, MA 02339
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 713950
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Worksite: The employer did not develop a written lockout tagout program. Pin setting machines are cleared of jams and repaired.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1750
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Pinsetting Area: The pin and ball conveyors and rotating wheels at each candlepin pinsetting station were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Pinsetting Area: Five pulley and belt drives at all twelve candlepin pinsetting stations were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: Maintenance Shop: The cover of the BP-A disconnect box was not latched in the closed position.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Pin Setting Platform: 1) The terminals at the switches at the chassis electrical boxes were not covered. 2) The covers of the chassis electrical boxes were not closed exposing live parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: Pinsetting Area: The employer did not train employees on electrical safety related work practices.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.333 A01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1): Live parts to which an employee may be exposed were not deenergized before the employee worked on or was near to them: Pinsetting Area: The employer did not develop a lockout tagout procedure for workers troubleshooting electrical chassis boxes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.333 B02 II A
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(A): Safe procedures for deenergizing circuits and equipment were not determined before circuits and equipment were denergized: Pin Setting Station: Safe procedures for deenergizing the electrical chassis boxes were not developed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.333 B02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iv): Qualified persons did not use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees were exposed and verify the circuit elements and equipment parts were deenergized. Pin Setting Area: The employer did not develop a method for verifying that electrical equipment is deenergized prior to handling parts at the electrical chassis box.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Pinsetting Area: Safety glasses and proper gloves and cotton clothing were not provided for employees who handle energized electrical components at the electrical chassis boxes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 713950)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339210569.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.