OSHA Inspection: MAZDA OF LAKEWOOD

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced

General-duty citation text

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing and struck-by hazards associated with improper automobile lift operations:       a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior to that date, employees were exposed to crushing, struck-by, and amputation hazards while working around automotive lifts as follows:          - The lift in the lube bay had non-functional lift mechanisms and two bungee cords were used to hold the locking mechanism in place. Employees had to reach into the lift frame area to attach the bungee cord, thus exposing them to amputation injuries should the lift hydraulics fail.         1) Lifts were not inspected periodically by a qualified inspector.            2) Lifts were not inspected daily during use to ensure that they were properly maintained and functional.        3) Lifts were not locked while servicing vehicles.        4) Employees were not properly trained on operating the vehicle lifts.        5) Lifts were not periodically maintained in accordance with the recommendation of the lift manufacturer.         6) Missing adapter pads, wood blocks were used on lifts.      Abatement note:     Feasible and acceptable methods to correct these hazardous conditions would be to follow the requirements in accordance to the instructions required in the ANSI/ALI ALOIM: 2008 Safety requirements for operation, inspection, and maintenance standard which includes but is not limited to the following:         1. Institute a periodic preventive maintenance program.          2. Lifts must be inspected by a qualified inspector.           3. Conduct and document periodic inspections and maintenance.          4. Retrain the employees' on the proper operating procedure for the vehicle lifts.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of every workroom was not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition. Where wet processes are used, drainage was not maintained and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places was not provided where practicable.    a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, Mazda of Lakewood as the controlling and exposing employer did not ensure that the employees were protected from slipping hazards in the following locations:        1) In the lower garage area where water was leaking from the ceiling to the floor. Employees travel across the water to access the compressor room.         2) In the service bay area where water was leaking from the ceiling to the floor. Employees work on wet floors while servicing vehicles.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, Mazda of Lakewood as the controlling and exposing employer did not ensure that the employees in the lower garage area were protected from entrapment in the event of an emergency. Three exit doors in the parking garage were locked and one was barricaded with 2" X 6" boards.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(1): 29 CFR 1910.37(b)(1): Each exit route was not adequately lighted so that employees with normal vision could see along the exit route:     a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, Mazda of Lakewood as the controlling and exposing employer did not ensure that the employees in the lower garage area were protected from entrapment in the event of an emergency. Three exit routes were not provided with lighting and illumination.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit must be clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit."   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, four exit doors were not marked with a sign reading "Exit". Employees were exposed to entrapment in the event of an emergency.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign must be illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color. Self-luminous or electroluminescent signs that have a minimum luminance surface value of at least .06 foot-lamberts (0.21 cd/m2) are permitted.   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, Mazda of Lakewood as the controlling and exposing employer did not ensure that the employees were protected from entrapment in the event of an emergency in the following locations.       1) Three exits signs in the lower garage area were not illuminated with at least 5 foot-candles.       2) Three exit signs in the main lobby area were not illuminated with at least 5 foot-candles.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, the employer did not assess the workplace to identify the hazards present to determine which personal protective equipment the employees have to use. Employees were using corrosive chemicals and were not provided with personal protective equipment.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): Except as provided by paragraphs (h)(2) through (h)(6) of this section, the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, was not provided by the employer at no cost to the employees:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, the employer did not provide the personal protective equipment at no cost to the employees. Some of the employees purchased their own safety glasses and gloves.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to eye injuries from using corrosive chemicals in the detail bay area. The employees were not protected with eye protection while using the chemicals while performing detail work on the vehicles.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to hand injuries from using corrosive chemicals in the detail bay area. The employees were not protected with heavy duty gloves that provided chemical protection while using the chemicals in performing detail work on the vehicles.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body was not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to corrosive materials while performing detail work on the vehicles. The employees were not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes in the event of an emergency.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(6): Equipment located in damp or wet locations was not identified for that purpose.      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to electric shock in the wash bay area where electrical equipment was used to provide power to a propane heater. The energized electrical wires of the equipment were not covered and were exposed near water.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, Mazda of Lakewood as the controlling and exposing employer did not ensure that the employees in the service bay area were protected from electric shock. Water was leaking from the roof to the walls near the energized electrical cabinets, boxes, and enclosures throughout the area and in the lower garage.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(vi): A receptacle installed in a wet location where the product intended to be plugged into it was not to be attended while in use (for example, sprinkler system controllers, landscape lighting, and holiday lights) did not have an enclosure that was weatherproof with the attachment plug cap inserted or removed:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to electric shock in the service bay area. Water was leaking from the roof to the wall and was near the energized electrical outlets used by the employees.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles located within 8 feet of the floor had live parts exposed to employee contact:      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to serious injuries from lighting fixtures in the detail bay area that were mounted to the wall approximately 6 feet high. The lighting fixtures were not protected from accidental contact by lighting guards or covers.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, the employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program. Employees were using hazard chemicals in the service bay area as part of their daily work duties.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemicals:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, containers were not labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity of the chemicals contained therein. Employees working in the service bay area were using the chemicals on a daily basis.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, the material safety data sheet of the chemicals used in the service area were not readily available to the employees. The employees were handling chemicals, including but not limited to:      1. MOC Purple Wire Wheel Cleaner     2. Coolant     3. Heavy Duty Prep Solvent

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals used in their work area, in that they were not provided with effective information and training on the hazards involving the use and handling of the following chemicals, including but not limited to:      1. MOC Purple Wire Wheel Cleaner     2. Coolant Oil     3. Heavy Duty Prep Solvent

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.23(a)(8)(ii): Every floor hole into which persons can accidentally walk were not guarded by a floor hole cover of standard strength and construction:      a) On or about July 25, 2013 and at times prior, employees working in the service bay were exposed to tripping hazards in the following locations:        1) Along the length of the shop where covers of the floor drain presented uneven edges and openings.        2) Floor holes in the lift area.     Mazda of Lakewood was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313717506, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 04/16/2010, with respect to a workplace located at 7999 W. Colfax Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80214.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 19, 2013

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program. Employees were using a 3M half-face respirator when performing detail work on the vehicles.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers were subjected to an annual maintenance check. The employer did not record the annual maintenance date and retained this record for one year after the last entry or the life of the shell, whichever was less. The record was not available to the Assistant Secretary upon request:      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, a portable fire extinguisher was not annually maintained at the lube bay area. The portable fire extinguisher was last maintained on February 2012.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Installation and use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, a relocatable power tap (power strip) and an electrical box were used by the employees at the service bay area. The power strip and electrical box were not listed or labeled in accordance to their instruction in their listing and labeling.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii): Electrical equipment was used when markings giving voltage, current, wattage, or other ratings as necessary were missing:      a) On or about July 25, 2013 and at times prior, three electrical switch panels at the West and East side of the service bay area were not marked with their voltage, current, wattage, or other ratings. The employees accessed the electrical panels to provide power to the equipment at the service bay area.

Issued

Sep 11, 2013

Abate by

Sep 17, 2013

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure;      a) On or about July 24, 2013 and at times prior, two flexible cords at the service bay area were used as a substitute for fixed wiring. Employees used the flexible cords to provide electrical power on equipment in the service bay area.