Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LM CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LM CONSTRUCTION, LLC in DUHON BLVD, METAIRIE, LA 70003 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339226318.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LM Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LM Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
DUHON BLVD
City
METAIRIE
State
LA
ZIP
70003
Mailing
1112 NORTH SIBLEY ST, METAIRIE, LA 70003
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds shall be fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports.  Duhon Blvd., Amelia, LA:  On or about July 24, 2013, the employer did not ensure that the working platform of the scaffold was fully planked.  Employee(s) were working from a plank measuring 12 x 12.  There was a gap of 45 1/2 in. between the plank and the front uprights.  Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights shall bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.  Duhon Blvd., Amelia, LA:  On or about July 24, 2013, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold poles rested on base plates and mud sills.  Eleven (11) scaffold poles were missing base plates and were resting on stacked pieces of wood measuring 6" x13" and 11" x 14".
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  Duhon Blvd., Amerlia, LA:  On or about July 24, 2013, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) used a ladder to access the upper level of the scaffold.  Employee(s) were observed climbing the scaffold crossbraces to gain access to the working platform.  Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Duhon Blvd., Amelia, LA:  On or about July 24, 2013, the employer did not ensure that the working platform of the scaffold was adequately guarded.  Employee(s) were working approximately 12 ft. high without a guardrail system in place.  Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated  Duhon Blvd., Amelia, LA:  On or about July 24, 2013, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) wore adequate fall protection while working from an aerial lift.  Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

View LM Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339226318.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.