BATON ROUGE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: LM CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LM CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 6060 BLUEBONNET BLVD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70809 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339482465.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LM CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 6060 BLUEBONNET BLVD
- City
- BATON ROUGE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70809
- Mailing
- 1112 NORTH SIBLEY ST, METAIRIE, LA 70003
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) On or about 11-13-13, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold being used on site had fully planked working platforms. The scaffold was approximatley 25 feet high. The working platforms consisted of 2 planks.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about 11-13-13, the employer failed to ensure that employees had adequate means of access and egress with the scaffold. The employees were climbing the frame of the scaffold to get on and off.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about 11-13-13, the employer failed to ensure that the working platforms of the scaffold had guardrails to protect employees from falling.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. On or about 11-11-13, the employer failed to ensure that fall protection was being worn by employee(s) while working out of the aerial lift man basket. An employee was observed approximately 15 feet high in the aerial lift man basket with no fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. On or about 11-13-13, the employer failed to ensure that employee(s) had fall protection when working more than 6 feet above the ground. An employee was observed working on an archway without fall protection that was approximately 2 feet wide and 20 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at LM Construction, LLC
View LM Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339482465.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.