FORT LAUDERDALE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES, INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES, INC in 1655 NW 136 AVENUE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33323 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 339232340.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES, INC
- Site address
- 1655 NW 136 AVENUE
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33323
- Mailing
- 2102 SW 2ND STREET, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333318
- Employees
- 434
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about July 26th 2013, at the above addressed jobsite spraying department, an eye wash station was not provided for immediate use while employees were exposed to corrosive chemicals such as but not limited to Rhino Extreme HP 11-50 resin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.1000 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the ceiling concentration of 0.2 mg/m3: On or about August 2nd, 2013, at the above address jobsite, an employee spraying a product that contained MDI was exposed to a ceiling concentration of 0.644 mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): On or about August 2nd, 2013, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not implement engineering or administrative controls while an employee spraying a product that contained MDI was exposed to a ceiling concentration of 0.644 mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: On or about August 2nd, 2013, at the above address jobsite, employees exposed to a product that contained methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) were not trained on the physical and health hazards related to this product.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $850 · Current $510 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: On or about August 2nd, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite sanding room, the employer did not keep a clean workplace due to excessive amounts of dust in the room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $510
- — Z (O) $850
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $850 · Current $510 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about August 2nd, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite spraying department, the employer did not implement a written respiratory protection program for employees using a supplied-air respirator during spraying processes at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $510
- — Z (O) $850
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about July 26th, 2013, at the above address jobsite, a rhino spraying machine power cord was not provided with strain relief.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Point Blank Enterprises, INC
View Point Blank Enterprises, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333318)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339232340.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.