Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: BRUMLEY MANUFACTURING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRUMLEY MANUFACTURING in 922840 MACK WASHINGTON LN, HEMPSTEAD, TX 77445 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 339282279.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Brumley Manufacturing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brumley Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
922840 MACK WASHINGTON LN
City
HEMPSTEAD
State
TX
ZIP
77445
Mailing
P.O. BOX 883, HEMPSTEAD, TX 77445
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
130
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees.    The employer does not ensure that lockout or tagout devices were affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees.                 a) This violation occurred on or about August 12, 2013, in Building 1 where operators of a Hyd-Mech Vertical Band Saw were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when performing setup and maintenance tasks without using locks to isolate energy sources.        b) This violation occurred on or about August 20, 2013, in Building 1 where mechanics were exposed to struck-by and electrical hazards when performing maintenance tasks on equipment such as but not limited to, an iron spot welder and a miller welder without using locks to isolate energy sources.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all authorized employees are affixing lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in Lockout and Tagout Procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2160
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.     The employer does not provide suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing for the eyes or body where employees are using corrosive chemicals.  This violation was observed on or about August 12, 2013, in mechanic shop where employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards when changing out,cleaning and filling batteries without an eyewash in the work area.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees have access to facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes or body.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2160
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    The employer does not guard the point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury.  This violation was observed on or about August 12, 2013, in Building 1 where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Hyd-Mech Vertical Saw without a guard on the front cutting blade.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that guards are installed on all machines to protect employees from the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose.   The employer does not ensure junction boxes were provided with covers. This violation was observed on or about August 12, 2013, in building #1 where wires to supply power to HV #1 Automatic Coping Machine were not provided with a covered enclosure.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all junction boxes are provided with complete enclosure for the contained conductors or cables.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift.   The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to employees in their work areas.  This violation was occurred on or about August 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the facility were required to handle hazardous chemicals without having readily accessible material safety data sheets in their work areas.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including the steps that it is taking to ensure that all material safety data sheets are readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   The employer does not ensure that employees were provided training on hazardous chemicals in the work areas.  This violation occurred on or about August 12, 2013 and times prior to, at the manufacturing facility where employees were required to handle hazardous chemicals before being trained to handle them safely.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees are trained on all hazards in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Brumley Manufacturing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339282279.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.