BATH, PA —
OSHA Inspection: L&M FABRICATION & MACHINE, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of L&M FABRICATION & MACHINE, INC. in 6814 CHRISPHALT DRIVE, BATH, PA 18014 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 339300675.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- L&M FABRICATION & MACHINE, INC.
- Site address
- 6814 CHRISPHALT DRIVE
- City
- BATH
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18014
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 124, BATH, PA 18014
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332313
- Employees
- 77
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G08 I
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $0 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(i): When a comparison of the annual audiogram to the baseline audiogram indicates a standard threshold shift, as defined in 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(10) has occurred, the employee was not informed of this fact in writing, within 21 days of the determination: a) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, an employee sustained a standard threshold shift when comparing the May 8, 2013 annual audiogram to the October 16, 2000 baseline audiogram and the employee was not notified in writing within 21 days of this determination. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.95 G08 II B
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(ii)(B): Unless a physician determines that the standard threshold shift is not work-related or aggravated by occupational noise exposure, the employer did not ensure, when a standard threshold shift occurs, that for employees already using hearing protectors, employees be refitted and retrained in the use of hearing protectors and provided with hearing protectors offering greater attenuation if necessary: a) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, the employer did not ensure that an employee (welder) who sustained a standard threshold shift was refitted and retrained in the use of their hearing protection and was provided protection that offered greater attenuation. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, an employee required to wear an airline supplied blasting helmet/hood to protect the employee from the hazards of silica while sand blasting steel was not provided a medical evaluation to ensure that the employee was medically able to wear a respirator in accordance with this section. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1249.5
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
04309010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, employees in the machine shop were using Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) manufactured by the Sherwin-Williams Company that was contained in spray bottles used to remove markings from parts. The container was not labeled with the chemical identity of chemical contained therein. b) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, employees were using silica sand to conduct abrasive blasting and the system storage container for the sand was not labeled with the chemical identity of chemical contained therein. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1249.5
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04309010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, employees in the machine shop were using Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) manufactured by the Sherwin-Williams Company to remove markings from parts. The spray bottles were not labeled with the appropriate hazard warning of the chemical contained therein. b) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, employees were using sand to conduct abrasive blasting and the system storage container for the sand was not labeled with the appropriate hazard warning of the chemical contained therein. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.10 A
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $595 · Current $417 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.10(a): Where an employee's hearing test (audiogram) revealed that the employee had experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears, and the employee's total hearing level was 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s) as the STS, the employer did not record the case on the OSHA 300 Log. a) L&M Fabrication - On or about August 27, 2013, the employer did not record a case on the OSHA 300 Log when an employee's May 8, 2013 audiometric test revealed that the employee had experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in right ear, and the employee's total hearing level was 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in that same ear. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $416.5
- — Z (O) $595
More inspections at L&M Fabrication & Machine, INC.
View L&M Fabrication & Machine, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332313)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339300675.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.