Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRIANGLE FRAMING CONTRACTORS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRIANGLE FRAMING CONTRACTORS in 17203 N.W. MILITARY, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78257 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339345449.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Triangle Framing Contractors — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Triangle Framing Contractors is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
17203 N.W. MILITARY
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78257
Mailing
1305 FM 359 RD. SUITE "L", RICHMOND, TX 77406
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) Building #2, On or about August 21, 2013, employees throughout the construction site were exposed to struck-by hazards when not wearing hard hats, while other employees were working above on the second level balcony unloading the stacks of drywall.    (b) Building #13, On or about August 21, 2013, employees throughout the construction site were exposed to struck-by hazards when not wearing hard hats, while other employees were working above on the pump jack scaffold using pneumatic nail guns for installing the exterior siding.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)  Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling:   Building #13, On or about August 21, 2013 employees were exposed to a fall greater than 10 feet when working from a pump jack scaffold, which did not employ end rails, while installing exterior siding to the building.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $800
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:   Building #2, On or about August 21, 2013, employee was exposed to the hazard of falls of approximately 20 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from a Genie S-60 aerial lift and not wearing a safety harness with lanyard, while installing the cornice siding to the building.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    Building #2, On or about August 21, 2013, employees were exposed to falls of greater than 6 feet to the ground level below, when working from second story balcony's, while unloading drywall into the apartment buildings.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Triangle Framing Contractors's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339345449.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.