SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: TRIANGLE FRAMING CONTRACTORS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRIANGLE FRAMING CONTRACTORS in 17203 N.W. MILITARY, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78257 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339532111.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRIANGLE FRAMING CONTRACTORS
- Site address
- 17203 N.W. MILITARY
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78257
- Mailing
- 25235 KELTON HILLS LANE, RICHMOND, TX 77406
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has the authority to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them): a) Building #4, 2nd floor, front balcony, left of stairway: On or about December 23, 2013, and at times prior thereto employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, while working near improperly installed guardrails . The employer failed to perform regular inspections of guardrail systems and correct hazards, such as but not limited to: top guardrail installed at a height of approximately 48 inches and mid rail installed at height of approximately 28 inches. b) Building #4, 2nd breezeway: On or about December 23, 2013, and at times prior thereto employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, while working near improperly installed guardrails. The employer failed to perform regular inspections of guardrail systems and correct hazards, such as but not limited to: top guardrail installed at a height of approximately 56 inches and a midrail installed at a height of approximately 25 1/2 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: a) Building #4, 2nd floor, front balcony, left of stairway: On or about December 23, 2013, and at times prior thereto employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet in height to the dirt ground below, while working near improperly installed guardrails, that had top rail installed at approximately 48 inches and mid rail installed at approximately 28 inches. The employees were not instructed on the guardrail installation requirements such as but not limited to guardrail heights. b) Building #4, 2nd breezeway: On or about December 23, 2013, and at times prior thereto employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, while working near improperly installed guardrails, that had top rail installed at approximately 56 inches and mid rail installed at approximately 25 1/2 inches. The employees were not instructed on the guardrail installation requirements such as but not limited to guardrail heights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.502 B01
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level: a) Building #4, 2nd floor, front balcony, left of stairway: On or about December 23, 2013, employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, due to top guardrail installed at a height of approximately 48 inches. b) Building #4, 2nd breezeway: On or about December 23, 2013, employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, due to top guardrails installed at a height of approximately 56 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.502 B02
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high: a) Building #4, 2nd floor, front balcony, left of stairway: On or about December 23, 2013, employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, from guardrails, mid rails, that were installed at a height of approximately 28 inches. b) Building #4, 2nd breezeway: On or about December 23, 2013, employees were exposed to a fall greater than 6 feet to the dirt ground below, from guardrails, mid rails, that were installed at a height of approximately 25 1/2 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Triangle Framing Contractors
View Triangle Framing Contractors's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339532111.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.