Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: PROSERV CRANE GROUP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PROSERV CRANE GROUP in 2020 EAST GRAUWYLER ST., IRVING, TX 75061 (NAICS 333923). OSHA activity number 339367542.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Proserv Crane Group for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Proserv Crane Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PROSERV CRANE GROUP
Site address
2020 EAST GRAUWYLER ST.
City
IRVING
State
TX
ZIP
75061
Mailing
2020 EAST GRAUWYLER ST., IRVING, TX 75061
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333923
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,205 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards of being struck-by and/or crushed-by machinery and/or equipment which is causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:       This violation most recently occurred on August 27, 2013, where employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards while operating overhead cranes. The safety latches at the throat of hooks were missing.         Instance a): This violation most recently occurred on August 27, 2013, where at least one (1) employee operated an overhead crane that was missing a safety latch at the throat of the hook.      Instance b): This violation was discovered where at least two (2) employees operated an overhead crane that was missing a safety latch at the throat of the hook.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2205
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,205 Reduced
1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard:    This violation was discovered on August 27, 2013, where employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards while storing equipment and/or machinery in storage racks. The storage racking did not have any bolts anchoring it to the floor at all.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2205
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.179 G01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $1,575 Reduced
1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control boxes were not clearly marked for identification of functions:       This violation was discovered on August 27, 2013, where the employer did not ensure that pendant control boxes were clearly marked for identification of functions.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1575
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,205 Reduced
1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections. All deficiencies such as listed were not carefully examined and determination made as to whether they constitute a safety hazard:        This violation was discovered on August 27, 2013, where the employer did not ensure that frequent inspections were performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2205
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.184 C14

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,205 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(14): The employer used slings without affixed and legible identification markings:         This violation occurred on August 27, 2013, where the employer did not ensure that slings without affixed identification markings were not used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2205
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel chain slings did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:       This violation occurred on August 27, 2013, where the employer did not ensure that alloy steel chain slings have affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Proserv Crane Group's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339367542.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.