WINNSBORO, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: WINNSBORO RUBBER RECYCLING, L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WINNSBORO RUBBER RECYCLING, L.L.C. in 3000 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, WINNSBORO, LA 71295 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 339410185.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WINNSBORO RUBBER RECYCLING, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 3000 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
- City
- WINNSBORO
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 71295
- Mailing
- 3000 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, WINNSBORO, LA 71295
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326299
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training, and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup, or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Instance 1: On or about 09/12/2013, in the Shredder Building, the employer did not establish a lock-out/tag-out program, which included procedures and training, for employees tasked with cleaning the magnet and shaker; industrial machines were not locked or tagged out during cleaning. Instance 2: On or about 09/12/2013, in the Production Plant and Shredder Building, the employer did not establish a lock-out/tag-out program, which included procedures and training, for employees tasked with changing the blades on the shredder, oiling the gear boxes, and maintaining the belts and roll mills; industrial machines were not locked or tagged out during aforementioned maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: Instance 1: On or about 09/12/2013, in the Office Building, the employer did not ensure that the portable fire extinguishers mounted to the walls were each subjected to an annual maintenance check. The last annual maintenance checks were performed in 08/2012. Instance 2: On or about 09/12/2013, in the Production Plant, the employer did not ensure that the portable fire extinguishers located throughout the building were each subjected to an annual maintenance check. The last annual maintenance checks were performed in 08/2012. Instance 3: On or about 09/12/2013, in the Shredder Building, the employer did not ensure that the portable fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The last annual maintenance check was performed in 08/2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: On or about 09/12/2013, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator had successfully completed the training to be a certified powered industrial truck operator per the aforementioned training requirements, prior to allowing them to operate a forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.178 Q01
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel: On or about 09/12/2013, the employer failed to ensure that the tires of the forklift were in safe operating condition prior to allowing employees to operate the forklift; tires had gouges on their sidewalls and chunks of rubber missing from their treads.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from the floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: On or about 09/12/2013, behind the Production Plant, the employer did not assure that the shafts on the power transmission belt for the fiber removal system were enclosed to prevent employees emptying the bins from contacting rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven (7) feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): On or about 09/12/2013, behind the Production Plant, the employer did not assure that the pulley and belt for the fiber removal system was guarded to prevent employees emptying the bins from contacting rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Winnsboro Rubber Recycling, L.L.C.
View Winnsboro Rubber Recycling, L.L.C.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326299)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339410185.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.