Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES OF VERMONT, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES OF VERMONT, INC in 27 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 339415143.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Plastic Technologies of Vermont, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Plastic Technologies of Vermont, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
27 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
LONDONDERRY
State
NH
ZIP
03053
Mailing
27 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a. Line 7- An employee changing a mold in the Rocheleau blow molding machine was not protected from amputation and crushing injuries where the machine was not locked out prior to performing service work.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  a. Site- Employees were not protected from amputation and crushing injuries where the employer failed to conduct annual inspections of their energy control procedures to ensure that employees were trained and following each of the energy control procedures.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Jan 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a. Site- Powered industrial truck operators were not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a. Line 2, Rocheleau Blow Mold Machine- Employees were not protected from nip points and moving parts which could cause laceration, crushing, and amputation injuries where the take away at the left side of the machine was not guarded.  b. Line 3, Rocheleau Blow Mold Machine- Employees were not protected from nip points and moving parts which could cause laceration, crushing, and amputation injuries where employees were reaching into the take away to clear jams.  c. Line 5, Uniloy Blow Mold Machine- Employees were not protected from moving parts at the point of operation which could cause crushing and laceration injuries where the swing arm was not guarded.  d. Line 6, Velocity Blow Mold Machine- Employees were not protected from nip points and moving parts which could cause crushing, laceration, and amputation injuries where employees were reaching into the take away and de-tabber to clear jams.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:  a. Site- An employee trouble shooting and repairing electrical equipment was not protected from electric shock and burns where the employer failed to provide safe electrical work practice training.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.333 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2):  a. Site- An employee was not protected from electric shock and burns while conducting repairs to electrical equipment that has been de-energized where the employer failed to provide locking equipment for circuit breakers.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:  a. Site- An employee conducting voltage testing on electrical equipment was not protected from electric shock and burns where electrical protective equipment for the hands, face, and body was not provided or worn.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.22 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Jan 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:  a. Lines 3, 6, and 7- Where a condensate line ran along the ceiling, water accumulated on the floor creating a slip hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  a. Warehouse, emergency exit- Circuit breakers inside a panel board were not marked to indicate their purpose.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 G01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Dec 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  a. Warehouse, emergency exit- On or about September 13, 2013 access to electrical panel boards was blocked with a snow blower and metal containers.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2013
Abate by
Jan 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:   a.       Line 7- Extension cords were used in place of fixed wiring.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View Plastic Technologies of Vermont, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339415143.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.