Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THE DURABLE SLATE COMPANY

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of THE DURABLE SLATE COMPANY in 632 W. MARKET STREET, LIMA, OH 45801 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 339420762.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Durable Slate Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Durable Slate Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
632 W. MARKET STREET
City
LIMA
State
OH
ZIP
45801
Mailing
1050 NORTH 4TH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43201
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury:         (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide training to employee(s) manually scraping lead-containing paint. Employee(s) were not familiar with the methods to use to protect from hazards associated with exposure to lead-containing paint.  The employee(s) were at risk of serious illness.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.62 D02 V F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): The employer did not provide training as required under paragraph (l)(1)(i) of this section regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication training; training as required under paragraph (l)(2)(iii) of this section, regarding use of respirators; and training in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.21, Safety training and education:           (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide training as interim protective measures to employee(s) manually scraping lead-containing paint. Employee(s) were not familiar with the health hazards associated with lead exposure and the methods, including but not limited to use of personal protective equipment, to use to protect from these hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 L02 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(l)(2)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in the purpose, proper selection, fitting, use, and limitations of respirators:        (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide training as interim protective measures to employee(s) manually scraping lead-containing paint. Employee(s) were not trained in the use of respiratory protection to protect from the hazards associated with exposure to lead-containing paint.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): The employer did not provide appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section:            (a)  Durable Restoration Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program that included work-site specific procedures and elements for required respirator use for employee(s) exposed to lead while scraping lead contaminated paint.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.62 F02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(f)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1926.62 to use a respirator:              (a)  Durable Restoration Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program that included work-site specific procedures and elements for required respirator use for employee(s) exposed to lead while scraping lead contaminated paint.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): The employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment as interim protective measures in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section:           (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not ensure that coveralls or similar full-body work clothing; gloves, hats, and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets; and face shields, vented goggles, or other appropriate eye and face protection were used as interim protective measures.  Employee were exposed to lead hazards and at risk of serious illness.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.62 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1): Where employees were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit, without regard to the use of respirators; where employees were exposed to lead compounds which may cause skin or eye irritation (e.g. lead arsenate, lead azide); and as interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), the employer did not provide at no cost to the employee and ensure that each employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments:       (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not ensue the use of coveralls or similar full-body work clothing; gloves, hats, and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets; and face shields, vented goggles, or other appropriate eye and face protection were used to protect from hazards associated with lead-containing paint.  Employee(s) were exposed to lead hazards and at risk of serious illness.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): The employer did not provide change areas in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this section:           (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide change areas for employees as an interim protective measure, including but not limited to, separate storage facilities for protective work clothing and equipment and for street clothes and assure that employees do not leave the workplace wearing any protective clothing worn during the work shift.  Employee(s) routinely left the site wearing contaminated work clothes.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.62 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators:           (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide change areas for employees as an interim protective measure, including but not limited to, separate storage facilities for protective work clothing and equipment and for street clothes and assure that employees do not leave the workplace wearing any protective clothing worn during the work shift.  The employee routinely left the site wearing contaminated work clothes.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(D): The employer did not provide hand washing facilities in accordance with paragraph (i)(5) of this section:             (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide hand washing facilities for employees as an interim protective measure, including but not limited to, hot and cold or tepid running water, hand soap or similar cleansing agent, and individual hand towels of cloth or paper or air blowers, for employees exposed to lead while scraping lead contaminated paint.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.62 I05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i): The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.51(f), for use by employees exposed to lead:         (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not provide adequate hand washing facilities for employees, including but not limited to, hot cold or tepid running water, hand soap or similar cleansing agent, and individual hand towels of cloth or paper or air blowers, for employees exposed to lead while scraping lead contaminated paint.    delete hot or tepid running water per Final Order
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 E02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(e)(2)(i): Prior to commencement of the job each employer shall establish and implement a written compliance program to achieve compliance with paragraph (c) of this section.             (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not develop and implement a written lead safety program to protect workers from lead hazards.  Employees were exposed to lead hazards and at risk of serious illness.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:                 (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) scraping paint while working from the roof of a porch was protected from falling.  Employee were standing on a short stepladder which was positioned on a porch roof without the benefit of fall protection.  The employee was at risk of a falling 13 feet to concrete ground below.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.62 D01 I

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $19,600 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who has a workplace or operations covered by this standard did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level:           (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not determine if any employee(s) were exposed to lead above the action level while scraping paint from the exterior of a historic  building.  Employee(s) manually removed lead-containing paint from wood trim and windows.  Employee(s) were exposed to lead hazards and at risk of serious illness if inhaled or ingested.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $19600
  • — C (W) $70000
  • — Z (W) $70000

1926.62 D01 III

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level:             (a)  Durable Slate Company, Columbus, Ohio:  On or about September 19, 2013, at the worksite located at 632 W. Market Street, Lima, Ohio, the employer did not determine if employee(s) were exposed to lead above the action level while scraping paint from the exterior of a historic  building.  Employee(s) manually removed lead-containing paint from wood trim and windows.  Employee(s) were exposed to lead hazards and at risk of serious illness if inhaled or ingested.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $0
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

View The Durable Slate Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339420762.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.