Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TEXAS COMMUNITY MEDIA LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TEXAS COMMUNITY MEDIA LLC in 320 EAST METHVIN ST., LONGVIEW, TX 75601 (NAICS 511110). OSHA activity number 339441313.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Texas Community Media LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Texas Community Media LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 EAST METHVIN ST.
City
LONGVIEW
State
TX
ZIP
75601
Mailing
320 EAST METHVIN ST., LONGVIEW, TX 75601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
511110
Employees
125
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment:     This violation was discovered on or about October 24, 2013, in the warehousing, press, bindery and mail room areas; where the employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    This violation was discovered on or about October 24, 2013; where the employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before an employee performed  service or maintenance work on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2047.5
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.176 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $1,024 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b):  Materials were not stored in a stable or secure manner:          This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the warehousing area, where the employer used industrial steel storage racks to store materials that had base plates that were not anchored to the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1023.75
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): The employer did not ensure that the performance evaluation for each operator of powered industrial trucks was conducted at least once every three years:          This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the warehousing area, where the employer did not ensure that the performance evaluation for each operator of powered industrial trucks was conducted at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2047.5
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:           This violation was discovered on or about October 24, 2013, in the Dauphin press area; where employees were not protected from point of operation, ingoing nip points, and rotating parts on the Dauphin Model DGM 850 possessed un-guarded pinch points located between the setting rollers and plate cylinder on the number eight (8) Dauphin Press.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2047.5
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):  Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:       This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the bindery areas, where an electrical 10/3 AWG SO electrical extension cord was attached to a single-gang, 110VAC standard electrical service plug and was not listed or labeled or used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2047.5
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed:             This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the press areas, where unused openings in cabinets, boxes and fittings were not effectively closed in the following instances:     a. an Enkel 460VAC motor controller possessed an approximate three-quarter (3/4) inch opening, and the employer did not ensure that unused openings in cabinets, boxes and fittings were effectively closed.     b.  an Enkel 460VAC motor controller possessed an approximate one (1) inch opening, and the employer did not ensure that unused openings in cabinets, boxes and fittings were effectively closed.     c. a Square "D" electrical power distribution panel that had two (2) circuit breaker slots not closed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):  Flexible cords and cables were used as a substitute for fixed wiring of the structure:       This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the bindery areas, where the employer used a 110 VAC, 10/3 AWG SO electrical extension cord to power a binding machine and related equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.303 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i):  Work space was less than 30 inches wide in front of electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less:         This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the mail room, near the inserter machines, where an electric power distribution panel located on the southeast wall of the mail room that powered the buildings branch circuits had tables and materials stored directly in the front of the panel, rendering the panel inaccessible.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2047.5
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2014
Abate by
Apr 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $1,024 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.       This violation most recently occurred on or about October 24, 2013, in the press, bindery areas, mail room and warehouse areas, where employees were exposed to skin contact and inhalation hazards during tasks involving the use of cleaning agents and other solvents, such as Butoxyethanol, Dipropylene Glycol Methyl Either.  No written program had been implemented to communicate chemical hazards and protection measures to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1023.75
  • · Z (S) $4500

View Texas Community Media LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339441313.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.