Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CANTEEN VENDING

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CANTEEN VENDING in 2890 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53719 (NAICS 454210). OSHA activity number 339473597.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Canteen Vending — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Canteen Vending is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CANTEEN VENDING
Site address
2890 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53719
Mailing
2890 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53719
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
454210
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2014
Abate by
Mar 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.    The employer failed to certify that the fork truck operators were provided practical training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1000

1910.134 D01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:     Warehouse employees carbon monoxide exposure was not assessed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     A written hazard communication program was not developed for warehouse employees working with LP gas, windshield washer fluid containing 35% methanol and exposed to carbon monoxide while working around LP fork trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Warehouse employees were not trained on the hazards associated with carbon monoxide, LP gas or windshield washer fluid containing 35% methanol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  Fork truck operators training did not include practical trainng.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Canteen Vending's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339473597.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.