Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: BOY'S COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BOY'S COMPANY in HANK HETTMANSPERGER'S PATIO AND CARPORT EXPANSION PROJECT 384 CHLAN LA CHACH, YIGO, GU 96929 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339479057.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Boy'S Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Boy'S Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BOY'S COMPANY
Site address
HANK HETTMANSPERGER'S PATIO AND CARPORT EXPANSION PROJECT 384 CHLAN LA CHACH
City
YIGO
State
GU
ZIP
96929
Mailing
PO 8143 MOU 3, YIGO, GU 96929
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer failed to initiate and maintain programs that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment were made by competent persons designated by the employer:   At the project on or about November 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the project had not been inspected or the person that did the inspection was not competent as there were about 25 unguarded rebars and two extension cords with no strain relief.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:   At the project on or about November 12, 2013, safety toed shoes were not worn while employees carried and used lumber and circular saws.  Employees wore closed shoes with no toe protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1020

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   At the project on or about November 12, 2013, the outside insulation on two extension cords was not connected to the plugs.  This caused pull to be directly transmitted to the plugs joints or terminals.  The extension cords powered a 110 VAC Ridgid circular saw, used to cut lumber.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.701(b): Reinforcing steel. All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:   At the project on or about November 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, about 25 rebars were not guarded to prevent impalement.  The 3/8s inch diameter rebars protruded vertically about 36 to 40 inches from a concrete slab and concrete blocks.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used only for the purpose for which they were designed:   At the project on or about November 12, 2013, an 8 foot long step ladder was used in the folded up position to access the roof.  The lowest eve of the roof was about 8 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339479057.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.