Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DELMAR GARDENS OF CHESTERFIELD

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DELMAR GARDENS OF CHESTERFIELD in 14855 N. OUTER 40 RD., CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339486318.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
14855 N. OUTER 40 RD.
City
CHESTERFIELD
State
MO
ZIP
63017
Mailing
14855 N. OUTER 40 RD., CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
210
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3)  Exit routes were not free and unobstructed. Materials or equipment must not be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route:  Kitchen, the designated emergency exit leading to the loading dock door was obstructed with carts containing racks of dishes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2)  Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit:"  The emergency exit from the kitchen led to the loading dock door to the outside.  The door to the outside was not marked with an "EXIT" sign for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c) Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.  In the laundry for employees who used corrosive chemicals including but not limited to Solid Stain-A-Way, Stain Blaster R, and Stain Blaster B, an approved eyewash was not available for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9)  Where the operator stands in front of the opening, a peripheral protecting  member or tongue guard, was not in place to adjust to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The distance of the opening exceeded one-fourth inch:  The Dayton 6" bench grinder used approximately once per month did not have tongue guards on both sides to adjust to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheels.  The distance of the opening between the wheel periphery and the grinder measured 1/2" on both sides.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.303 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A)  The depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts was less than indicated in Table S-1. Distances shall be measured from the live parts if they are exposed or from the enclosure front or opening if they are enclosed:  a) Kitchen, electrical panel box servicing toaster, lights, Robocoupe, microwave, blender, and blixer, etc. (208/120V) were blocked by serving tray stands and a table approximately 16 inches from the electrical panel box.   b) Kitchen, the knife switch shut-off box below the dish draining tables was blocked by racks.    c) Division 700 soiled utility room, the electrical panel boxes were blocked by biohazard barrels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.304 G06 VI

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(6)(vi): Exposed noncurrent-carrying metal parts of cord- and plug-connected equipment that may become energized shall be grounded under any of the following conditions:  In the kitchen the portable food warmer transferred daily to the dining room was not grounded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii)   Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  In the kitchen, the cord and plug servicing the portable food warmer lacked strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i)  Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were notl visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  In the kitchen the cord and plug servicing the portable food warmer transferred daily to the dining room had a missing ground pin and lack of strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.8 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $850 · Current $595 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.8(a)  All work-related needle stick injuries and cuts from sharp objects that were contaminated with another person's blood or other potentially infectious material (as defined by 29 CFR 1910.1030) were not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log as an injury without the employee's name entered to protect the employee's privacy. (See the requirements for privacy cases in paragraphs 1904.29(b)(6) through 1904.29(b)(9)).  a)  2013 OSHA 300 Log, case # 15 b)  2013 OSHA 300 Log, case # 26
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $595
  • — Z (O) $850

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 29 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:  a) 2013 OSHA 300 Log, Cases # 9, 10, 12, and 13 had days away from work but were recorded in Column I (Job Transfer or Restriction) rather than in Column H (Days away from Work). b) 2013 OSHA 300 Log, Cases # 2, 7, 15, 16, 18, and 21 were not recorded in Column J (Other Recordable Cases). c) 2012 OSHA 300 Log, Case #29 had days away from work but was recorded in Column I (Job Transfer or Restriction) rather than in Column H (Days away from Work). d) 2012 OSHA 300 Log, Cases # 2, 4, 8, 11, 14, 20, and 23 were recorded in both Columns H and I, rather than just in Column H. e) 2011 OSHA 300 Log,  Cases # 2, 7, 10, 14, 17, 23, and 25 had days away from work but were recorded in Column I (Job Transfer or Restriction) rather than in Column H (Days away from Work). f)  2010 OSHA 300 Log, Cases #2, 4, 14, and 29 had days away from work but were recorded in Column I (Job Transfer or Restriction rather than in Column H (Days away from Work).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339486318.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.