Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RECREATION UNLIMITED, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RECREATION UNLIMITED, LLC in 111 MATTHEWS DRIVE, AMERICUS, GA 31709 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 339511503.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Recreation Unlimited, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Recreation Unlimited, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
111 MATTHEWS DRIVE
City
AMERICUS
State
GA
ZIP
31709
Mailing
111 MATTHEWS DRIVE, AMERICUS, GA 31709
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2014
Abate by
Apr 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $2,625
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:  (a)  In the Cutting/Grinding Area, on or about December 11, 2013 and at times prior to, the employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 340% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 93.8 dBA during the 448 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.  (b)  In the Cutting/Grinding Area, on or about December 11, 2013 and at times prior to, the employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 310% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 93.1 dBA during the 421 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2625

1910.95 I02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors are worn by any employee who is exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels or greater:   (a)  In the Cutting/Grinding Area, on or about December 11, 2013 and at times prior to, the employer did not enforce the use of hearing protection by an employee who was exposed to noise at 340% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 93.8 dBA during the 448 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.  (b)  In the Cutting/Grinding Area, on or about December 11, 2013 and at times prior to, the employer did not enforce the use of hearing protection by an employee who was exposed to noise at 310% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 93.1 dBA during the 421 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2014
Abate by
Apr 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $2,625
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a) In the both the Cutting/Grinding Area and Lamination Area, on or about December 11, 2013 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide a medical evaluations to employees who were required to wear respirators, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2625

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2014
Abate by
Apr 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   (a) In the both the Cutting/Grinding Area and Lamination Area, on or about December 11, 2013 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide a fit test to employees who were required to wear respirators, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Recreation Unlimited, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339511503.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.