Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SIPPEL STEEL FABRICATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SIPPEL STEEL FABRICATION in 101 PORT AMBRIDGE DRIVE, AMBRIDGE, PA 15003 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339513764.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sippel Steel Fabrication — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sippel Steel Fabrication is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
101 PORT AMBRIDGE DRIVE
City
AMBRIDGE
State
PA
ZIP
15003
Mailing
101 PORT AMBRIDGE DRIVE, AMBRIDGE, PA 15003
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
134
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Aug 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1520

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Iron Oxide listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 10 milligrams per cubic meter:     a)  At the facility, on or about December 9, 2013 - An employee designated as a welder was exposed to Iron Oxide to an airborne concentration of 18.4 milligrams per cubic meter.  This is approximately 1.84 times in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 10 milligrams per cubic meter.  Sampling was conducted for 198 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for 282 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Aug 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1520

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  a)  At the facility, on or about December 9, 2013 - Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to achieve compliance with the Iron Oxide Permissible Exposure Limit.  An employee designated as a welder was exposed to Iron Oxide to an airborne concentration of 18.4 milligrams per cubic meter.  This is approximately 1.84 times in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 10 milligrams per cubic meter.  Sampling was conducted for 198 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for 282 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1520

29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2): A respirator was not provided to each employee when necessary to protect the health of such employee:  a)  At the facility, on or about December 9, 2013 - A respirator was not provided to each employee when necessary to protect the health of such employee.  An employee designated as a welder was exposed to Iron Oxide to an airborne concentration of 18.4 milligrams per cubic meter.  This is approximately 1.84 times in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 10 milligrams per cubic meter.  Sampling was conducted for 198 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for 282 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1520

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)  At the facility, on or about December 9, 2013 - Employes, who were required to wear a respirator, when welding inside the containment, were not provided with a medical evaluation prior to the required use of a respirator.  An employee designated as a welder was exposed to Iron Oxide to an airborne concentration of 18.4 milligrams per cubic meter.  This is approximately 1.84 times in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 10 milligrams per cubic meter.  Sampling was conducted for 198 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for 282 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1520

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph:    a)  At the facility, on or about December 9, 2013 -   Employes, who were required to wear a respirator, when welding inside the containment, were not provided with a fit test prior to the required use of a respirator.  An employee designated as a welder was exposed to Iron Oxide to an airborne concentration of 18.4 milligrams per cubic meter.  This is approximately 1.84 times in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 10 milligrams per cubic meter.  Sampling was conducted for 198 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for 282 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:    a)  At the facility, on or about December 9, 2013 - Employees were not provided training on the hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment.  Employees are exposed to welding fumes such as, but not limited to, iron oxide when welding on carbon steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1520

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    a)  At the facility on or about December 9. 2013 -  Employees were not provided training on the new label elements and safety data sheets format.  Employees are exposed to welding fumes including, but not limited to, iron oxide when welding on carbon steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Sippel Steel Fabrication's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339513764.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.