Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.D. CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J.D. CONSTRUCTION in 600 SOUTH STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339515207.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.D. Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.D. Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
J.D. CONSTRUCTION
Site address
600 SOUTH STREET
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19106
Mailing
421 SAGAMORE ROAD, HAVERTOWN, PA 19083
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    a)    600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 40 feet above the level below while performing stucco operations from a steel fabricated frame scaffold without any form of fall protection.  Observed on or about December 3, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): 29 CFR 1926.450(b)(1):  Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:   a) 600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 40 feet above the level below while performing stucco operations from a steel fabricated frame scaffold that was not fully planked.  Observed on or about December 3, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(5)(i): Ramps and walkways 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels did not have guardrail systems that comply with subpart M of this part -- Fall Protection:  a)    600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 40 feet above the level below while using the walkway as access between the scaffolds on the north and east sides of the building that was not provided a guardrail system.  Observed on or about December 3, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph:    a)     600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-  Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing stucco operations from a scaffold that was not guyed, tied, or braced at heights up to 40 feet or a (8:1) height to base width ratio. Observed on or about December 3, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    a)    600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-  An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 35 to 40 feet above the level below while climbing out of a window opening and onto a crossbrace to climb to the top level of the scaffold.  There was no ladder from the ground or the roof and no ramp from the building to access that working level.  Observed on or about December 3, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   a)    600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-   Two scaffolds were not inspected by a competent person before the work shift.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 40 feet above the level below while performing stucco operations from these two incomplete scaffolds.  Observed on or about December 3, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  a)  600 South Street, Philadelphia, PA-  Employees were not provided training to recognize, control, and minimize the hazards associated with working on scaffolds. These employees performed stucco operations from two incomplete scaffolds and were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 40 feet above the level below.  Noted on or about December 3, 2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View J.D. Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339515207.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.