GALVESTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MALIN INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & DRYDOCK, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MALIN INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & DRYDOCK, INC. in PORT OF GALVESTON PIER 41, GALVESTON, TX 77550 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 339523243.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MALIN INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & DRYDOCK, INC.
- Site address
- PORT OF GALVESTON PIER 41
- City
- GALVESTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77550
- Mailing
- 320 77TH STREET, GALVESTON, TX 77554
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336611
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, the employer did not determine the airborne concentration of lead when employees torch cut, used cut off wheels and performed grinding and welding on coatings containing inorganic lead, exposing employees to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4620
- — Z (S) $4620
1910.1018 E02
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $770 · Current $462 Reduced
0260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(e)(2): Initial monitoring was not performed for each workplace, or work operation covered by 29 CFR 1910.1018 to accurately determine the airborne concentration of inorganic arsenic to which employees may be exposed: At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, the employer did not determine the airborne concentration of inorganic arsenic when employees torch cut, used cut off wheels and performed grinding and welding on coatings containing inorganic arsenic, exposing employees to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $462
- — Z (O) $770
1910.1018 K01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $770 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(k)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of inorganic arsenic: At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, lunch break room eating surfaces were found to contain inorganic arsenic, exposing employees to a toxic ingestion hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $770
1910.1018 O01 II A
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $770 · Current $462 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(o)(1)(ii)(A): The training did not include the information in appendix A: At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, the employer did not provide employees hazard training including information in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.1018 when employees were exposed to inorganic arsenic, exposing employees to a toxic exposure hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $462
- — Z (O) $770
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $770 · Current $462 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, the employer did not provide employees hazard training including information in Appendices A and B to 29 CFR 1910.1025 when employees were exposed to inorganic lead, exposing employees to a toxic exposure hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $462
- — Z (O) $770
1915.1026 D02 I
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $770 · Current $462 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer using the scheduled monitoring option did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure to chromium (VI) for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area: At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, the employer did not determine the airborne concentration of chromium (VI) when employees torch cut, used cut off wheels and performed grinding and welding on coatings containing chromium (VI), exposing employees to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $462
- — Z (O) $770
1915.1026 J01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $770 · Current $462 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.1026(j)(1): 29 CFR 1915.1026: The employer did not ensure that at least the following Chromium VI hazards were addressed when providing Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) 1910.1200 information and training: Cancer; skin sensitization; and eye irritation. At the facility, onboard M/V HELIX 534: On or about November 20, 2103, and times thereafter, the employer did not provide employees training on Chromium VI hazards including cancer, skin sensitization and eye irritation when employees were exposed to Chromium VI, exposing employees to an inhalation and skin sensitization hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $462
- — Z (O) $770
More inspections at Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, INC.
View Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336611)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339523243.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.