Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CLARK TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CLARK TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC. in 117 NORTH INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, MILTON, PA 17847 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339533853.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Clark Technology Systems INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Clark Technology Systems INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
117 NORTH INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD
City
MILTON
State
PA
ZIP
17847
Mailing
159 HARVEYS LANE, MILTON, PA 17847
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,023 · Current $1,517 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): An open flame or spark producing equipment was present in the spraying area or within 20 feet thereof and not separated by a partition.  a) Clark Technology Systems, Plant 1:  An employee sprayed the flammable paint system, PPG Amercoat, within 20 feet of welding operations, on or about 01/14/2014.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1517.25
  • — Z (S) $2023

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:  a) Clark Technology Systems, Plant 1:  An employee sprayed the flammable paint system, PPG Amercoat, in a spray area where electrical devices (i.e., welding equipment and electrical receptacles) were not of an explosion proof type, on or about 01/14/2014.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,517 · Current $1,138 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Plant 2, Spray Booth Area:  Employees were required to wear half-mask elastomeric respirators while spraying paint and the employees were not provided with a medical evaluation prior to donning the respirator, on or about 12/30/2013.  b) Plant 2, Abrasive Blasting Area:  Employees were required to wear an abrasive blasting respirator while abrasive blasting and the employees were not provided with a medical evaluation prior to donning the respirator, on or about 12/30/2013.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1137.75
  • — Z (S) $1517

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece is used, and at least annually thereafter.  a) Plant 2, Spray Booth Area:  Employees were required to wear half-mask elastomeric respirators while spraying paint and the employees were not provided with a respirator fit test, on or about 12/30/2013.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a) Plant 2, Spray Booth Area:  Employees were required to wear half-mask elastomeric respirators while spraying paint and the employees were not provided with respirator training, on or about 12/30/2013.  b) Plant 2, Abrasive Blasting Area:  Employees were required to wear an abrasive blasting respirator while abrasive blasting and the employees were not provided with respirator training, on or about 12/30/2013.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,517 · Current $1,138 Reduced

Hazardous substances 108025909920

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) Clark Technology Systems, Plant 1:  An employee poured, mixed, and sprayed the corrosive chemical, PPG Amercoat 90HS Cure, and the employer did not provide the employee with an emergency eyewash for immediate use, on or about 01/14/2014.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1137.75
  • — Z (S) $1517

1910.107 G07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and the paint storage rooms:  a) Clark Technology Systems, Plant 1:  An employee sprayed the flammable paint system, PPG Amercoat, in a spray area that was not labeled as a no smoking area, on or about 01/14/2014.  ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2014
Abate by
Jun 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ii): The written program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators:  a) Clark Technology Systems:  Employees were required to wear respirators and the employer's written respiratory protection program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators, on or about 12/30/2013.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Clark Technology Systems INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339533853.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.