Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AIR FLOW TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AIR FLOW TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 4810 70TH AVE., KENOSHA, WI 53144 (NAICS 333411). OSHA activity number 339545394.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AIR Flow Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AIR Flow Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4810 70TH AVE.
City
KENOSHA
State
WI
ZIP
53144
Mailing
4810 70TH AVE., KENOSHA, WI 53144
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333411
Employees
88
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    (a) In Room 1 between the Thermatron heat seal presses and the saw tables, the employer did not ensure the aisle way was free of trip hazards, such as but not limited to extension cords stretched across the path.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  (a) In Room 1 near the Thermatron machines and filter-cutting saws, an orange extension cord and temporary relocatable power tap were daisy-chained together to power a radio and floor fan.  (b) In Room 1, near the Thermatron machines and filter-cutting saws, an red/orange extension cord and temporary relocatable power tap were daisy-chained together to power a radio and cell phone charger.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:  (a) In Room 1 near the Thermatron machines and filter-cutting saws, an orange extension cord powering a temporary relocatable power tap, radio and floor fan was missing a grounding pin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    (a)  In the production area, employees were not protected from fall hazards of at least 108 inches by standard guardrails when accessing the upper mezzanine level to retrieve filter product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 88 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,950 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    (a) The employer did not perform a hazard assessment to determine personal protective equipment needs based on hazards associated with the job. This includes but is not limited to using filter-cutting table saws and box staplers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2950
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  (a) The employer did not ensure employees using equipment, such as but not limited to the Wolf and N.C. saws and the box stapler, were utilizing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a)  The employer did not develop an energy control program, including procedures, training, and periodic inspections, to protect employees during maintenance and/or setup activities from the unexpected energization of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a)  The employer did not develop lockout/tagout procedures to control hazardous energy when performing maintenance and/or setup work (e.g. changing plates in the Thermatron heat seal presses).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:    (a)  The employer did not provide information and training at the authorized and affected levels for the control of hazardous energy to ensure employees understood their specific responsibilities during maintenance and/or setup activities (e.g. changing plates in the Thermatron heat seal presses).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by saw blades:    (a) In Room 1 of the production area, the employer did not ensure the circular filter saws, such as but not limited to the N.C. filter-cutting saws, had the guards affixed during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):    (a)  In the heat seal area, the side of the Thermatron (Model: F15-36) heat seal press table had energized connectors exposed due a cover plate not being in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

View AIR Flow Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339545394.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.