Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DURA-STRESS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DURA-STRESS, INC. in 11325 C.R. 44 EAST, LEESBURG, FL 34749 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 339548349.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dura-Stress, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dura-Stress, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DURA-STRESS, INC.
Site address
11325 C.R. 44 EAST
City
LEESBURG
State
FL
ZIP
34749
Mailing
P.O. BOX 490779, LEESBURG, FL 34749
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327390
Employees
170
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 150 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,782 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(a)(1):  The emergency action plan required by 29 CFR 1910.157(a) or (b) when the employer has elected to partially or totally evacuate the workplace in the event of a fire emergency, or required by 29 CFR 1910.160(c)(1), did not cover the designated actions that the employer or employees must take to ensure employee safety from the fire and other emergencies:  a) At the establishment, employees fully evacuated and the emergency action plan did not cover the action to take to ensure employees' safety, on or January 15, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1782
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.38 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 170 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(2): The emergency action plan did not include procedures for emergency evacuation, including type of evacuation and exit route assignments:  a) At the establishment, the emergency action plan did not include type of evacuation and exit route assignments, on or January 15, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 170 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(3): The  emergency action plan did not include the procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate.  a) At the establishment, the emergency action plan did not cover the procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate, on or January 15, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 C04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 170 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(4): The emergency action plan, at a minimum, did not include procedure for accountability for all employees after evacuation.  a) At the establishment, the emergency action plan did not include the procedures for accountability of employees, on or January 15, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 C06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 170 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(6):  The emergency action plan did not include the name or job title of every employee who may be contacted by employees who need more information about the plan or an explanation of their duties under the plan.  a) At the establishment, the emergency action plan did not include who to contact for more information, on or January 15, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,782 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a)At the establishment, the most recent forklift operator training was done on June 22, 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1782
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.67 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(ii): An employee(s) operating an aerial lift(s) was not properly trained:   a) At the maintenance shop, an employee operated an aerial lift, Genie S-60,  model 600-121, without been trained on or about  January 15, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2014
Abate by
May 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $990 · Current $594 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  a) At the establishment, maintenance and repairs were done in equipment such as mixers with used 480 volts, 3 phase and hydraulic energy, on or about February 4, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $594
  • — Z (O) $990

View Dura-Stress, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339548349.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.