SALEM, OH —
OSHA Inspection: METAL & WIRE PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METAL & WIRE PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. in 1065 SALEM PARKWAY, SALEM, OH 44460 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 339552382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- METAL & WIRE PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 1065 SALEM PARKWAY
- City
- SALEM
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44460
- Mailing
- 1065 SALEM PARKWAY, SALEM, OH 44460
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332116
- Employees
- 70
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II C
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure machine specific energy control procedures included steps for the placement, removal, and transfer of lockout devices. Equipment includes, but is not limited to, welding robots, and mechanical power presses. Hazardous energy sources includes, but is not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, compressed gas, and hydraulic power.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not conduct periodic inspections of the energy control procedures at least annually to ensure the procedure and requirements of 1910.147 were being followed. Equipment includes, but is not limited to, welding robots and mechanical power presses. Hazardous energy sources includes, but is not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, compressed gas, and hydraulic power.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure authorized employees conducting die changes on mechanical power presses received training in the recognition of hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control. Hazardous energy sources include, but are not limited to, electric, pneumatic, and hydraulic power.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from the ingoing nip point of the powered feed rolls of the Sesco straightener. b. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from the rotating non-working portion of the blade, of a FMB series automatic, model Jupiter horizontal band saw. c. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from the rotating parts and flying sparks of the robotic welder, in welding cell #2. d. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from the rotating parts and flying sparks of the Miller #5576 robotic welder, in welding cell #4.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A02
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the side door guards of the HAAS VF3 #2231 CNC machine were secured by locking the doors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the point of operation of a HTC 120 ton hydraulic press brake was guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the safety guard of a Dewalt DW758 abrasive wheel grinder, covered the spindle end, nut, and flange projections.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure a Dewalt DW758 abrasive wheel grinder, had a work rest to support the work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure a Dewalt DW758 abrasive wheel grinder, had an adjustable tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 B07 III
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(iii): Fixing of the selection was not by means capable of supervision by the employer: a. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not supervise the keys used to select the means of operation of the AIDA, 200 ton part revolution mechanical power press, #4463. b. On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not supervise the keys used to select the means of operation of the Niagara. 148 ton part revolution mechanical power press, #4483.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.217 B08 I
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(8)(i): Power press control system(s) on mechanical power press(es) were not provided with main power disconnect switch(es), capable of being locked only in the off position: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the Niagara 148 ton SC2-200-72-36 part revolution mechanical power presses, #4483 was equipped with a main electrical power disconnect switch capable of being locked in the off position.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.217 B13
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(13): Control system(s) of mechanical power press(es) were not constructed so that a failure within the system would not prevent the normal stopping action from being applied to the press when required, but would prevent initiation of a successive stroke until the failure is corrected: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the following part revolution mechanical power presses were equipped with control reliability when employees performed hand in die feeding: a. AIDA 200 ton mechanical power press #4463 b. Niagara 148 ton mechanical power press #4482 c. Niagara 148 ton mechanical power press #4483 d. Bliss 135 ton mechanical power press #4422 e. Bliss 30 ton mechanical power press #4432
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.217 B14 III
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(14)(iii): Brake system monitoring on mechanical power press(es) was not constructed and installed in a manner to monitor brake system performance on each stroke: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the following part revolution mechanical power presses had a brake monitoring system installed to monitor brake system performance when employees performed hand in die feeding: a. AIDA 200 ton mechanical power press #4463 b. Niagara 148 ton mechanical power press #4482 c. Niagara 148 ton mechanical power press #4483 d. Bliss 135 ton mechanical power press #4422 e. Bliss 30 ton mechanical power press #4432
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure a Verson 150 ton mechanical power press, known as #4526, required the application of both of the operators hands and the controls were located at such a safety distance from the point of operation that the slide completes the downward travel before the operator can reach into the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.217 C03 VII D
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(3)(vii)(d): Two hand controls used with mechanical power press(es) were not fixed in position so that only a supervisor or safety engineer was capable of relocating the controls: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the two hand controls of the following part revolution mechanical power presses, were located in a fixed position not capable of being relocated by machine operators; a. AIDA 200 ton mechanical power press #4463 b. Niagara 100 ton mechanical power press #4462 c. Niagara 148 ton mechanical power press #4483 d. Bliss 135 ton mechanical power press #4422
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.217 D09 I
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(i): The employer did not establish a die setting procedure for mechanical power press(es) that would ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.217(c) On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not establish die setting procedures for their mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.217 D09 IV
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(iv): Safety blocks were not used when mechanical power press die(s) were being adjusted or repaired in the press: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure safety blocks were used on mechanical power presses when dies were being repaired or adjusted in the press.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.217 E01 II
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(ii): Mechanical power press(es) were not inspected and tested at least weekly to determine the condition of the clutch/brake mechanism, antirepeat feature, and single-stroke mechanism: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure weekly mechanical power press inspections were conducted to determine the condition of the clutch/brake mechanism, anit-repeat feature, and/or single-stroke mechanism.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.255 B04
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.255(b)(4): All press welding machine operations, where there was a possibility of the operator's fingers being under the point of operation, were not effectively guarded by use of a device such as an electronic eye safety circuit, two hand controls or protection similiar to that prescribed for punch press operation, 1910.217: On or about January 15, 2014, the employer did not ensure the point of operation of the following spot welders were guarded: a. Spot welder #5581 b. Spot welder #5579 c. Spot welder #5531
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- May 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about January 15, 2014, the flexible cords located on the two hand control buttons of the following mechanical power presses was not fitted so that strain relief was provided to prevent pull; a. AIDA 200 ton mechanical power press, #4463. b. Clearing 150 ton mechanical power press. c. Niagara 100 ton power press, #4462.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
More inspections at Metal & Wire Products Company, INC.
View Metal & Wire Products Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332116)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339552382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.