Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: ALLIED OIL AND SUPPLY INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALLIED OIL AND SUPPLY INC. in 2209 SO. 21ST ST., OMAHA, NE 68103 (NAICS 326212). OSHA activity number 339559270.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Allied OIL and Supply INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Allied OIL and Supply INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2209 SO. 21ST ST.
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68103
Mailing
2209 S 24TH ST, OMAHA, NE 68108
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326212
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2014
Abate by
Mar 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,375 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(l)(6): Electrostatic hand spraying equipment did not meet the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.107(i) and other subparagraphs of this paragraph when used in powder coating:    Powder coat spray gun operator(s) wore leather gloves and were not grounded through the handle of the spray gun or through the use of grounding straps per 29 CFR 1910.107(i)(5).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2375
  • — C (S) $4250
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2014
Abate by
Mar 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,375 Reduced

Hazardous substances T405

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered.    Employee(s) spraying powder coat containing a triglycidyl isocyanurate toxic sensitizer, wore short sleeves, leather gloves, and did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment to prevent skin contact.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2375
  • — C (S) $3400
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2014
Abate by
Mar 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances T405

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.    A certified job-specific hazard assessment to determine the need for personal protective equipment including, but not limited to appropriate clothing/gloves for powder coat spray operators, was not available upon agency request.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2014
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,375 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.    Appropriate machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other personnel from pinch points, rotating shafts, rotating parts, and cutting heads of the dual-head and single-head tire buffer machines.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2375
  • — C (S) $4250
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2014
Abate by
Mar 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,375 Reduced

Hazardous substances T405

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area.    Powder coat operators had not received effective training on the hazards of chemicals including, but not limited to the sensitizing and toxic properties of the Corvel White powder coat.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2375
  • — C (S) $3400
  • — Z (S) $3400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339559270.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.