NORTH PRAIRIE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: D & D PRODUCTS INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of D & D PRODUCTS INCORPORATED in 200 NORTH HARRISON STREET, NORTH PRAIRIE, WI 53153 (NAICS 333922). OSHA activity number 339562696.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D & D PRODUCTS INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 200 NORTH HARRISON STREET
- City
- NORTH PRAIRIE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53153
- Mailing
- 200 NORTH HARRISON STREET, NORTH PRAIRIE, WI 53153
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333922
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) The employer did not ensure all forklift operators were trained to have the knowledge and skills necessary to operate the forklifts safely.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $825
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, an Ellis horizontal bandsaw did not have the unused portion of the blade guarded exposing employees to struck-by hazards. (b) In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, a Scotchman hydraulic ironworker was not equipped with point of operation guards, devices, awareness barriers, and/or adjustable restricters during use of the angle iron, shear blade, or punch stations exposing employees to struck-by hazards. (c) In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, a hydraulic ironworker was not equipped with point of operation guards, devices, awareness barriers, and/or adjustable restricters during use of the punch station exposing employees to struck-by hazards. (d) In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, the Summit Shear had a guard opening of approximately 7/8" in some areas and between 1 7/8" and 2 1/8" in other which allowed access to the hold downs and shear blade exposing employees to amputation hazards. (e) In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, the press brake had inadequate guarding at the point of operation exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: (a) In the Fabrication Bay, an 8 in bench grinder had the tongue guard on the right side adjusted to approximately 5/8" exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $825
- · Z (S) $1360
1915.134 B
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.134(b): Work rests were not kept a distance not to exceed 1/8 inch from the surface of the wheel. (a) In the Fabrication Bay, an 8 in bench grinder had a work rest on the left side adjusted to approximately 3/4" exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: (a) In Building 2; the crane hoist 220V 30 Amp disconnect had a missing knockout exposing employees to electrical shock hazards. (b) In Building 2; the service from main fuse box 220V 100 Amp disconnect had two missing knockouts exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1360
1915.51 F02
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.51(f)(2): Employees who were welding, cutting or heating were not protected by suitable eye protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 1915.153. (a) In the Fabrication Bay, employees performing tack welding operations were using their hand to shield from the welding operations exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $825
- · Z (S) $1360
1915.56 E
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.56(e): Arc welding and cutting operations were not shielded by noncombustible or flameproof screens to protect employees in the vicinity from the direct rays of the arc. (a) In the Fabrication Area, employees working in near proximity of the welders were not protected by welding curtains exposing them to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1360
1915.89 Q01
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.89(q)(1): The employer did not ensure that the audit was performed by an authorized employee other than the one(s) currently using the energy-control procedure being reviewed. (a) The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection at least annually to ensure the procedures and authorized employees were being followed and to correct any deficiencies.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $825
- · Z (S) $1360
1915.112 C01 I
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.112(c)(1)(i): Employer did not ensure chain and chain slings have permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer indicating the recommended safe working load for the type(s) of hitch(es) used. (a) In the Assembly Area, several chain slings were not tagged with the size, grade, rated capacity, or reach exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1360
1915.112 C02
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.112(c)(2): Chain inspections did not include inspection for wear, defective welds, deformation, and increase in length or stretch. (a) In the Assembly Area, the chain sling were not inspected at least once every three months exposing employees to struck-by hazards. Several chain slings used for painting had bent washers, defective links.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(a)(2): Grounded conductors were attached to terminals or leads so as to reverse designated polarity: (a) In Building 2, an outlet used to power the exhaust fan and fluorescent light had the hot and neutral conductors reversed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at D & D Products Incorporated
View D & D Products Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333922)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339562696.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.