Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: D & D PRODUCTS INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of D & D PRODUCTS INCORPORATED in 200 NORTH HARRISON STREET, NORTH PRAIRIE, WI 53153 (NAICS 333922). OSHA activity number 339562696.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D & D Products Incorporated for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D & D Products Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
200 NORTH HARRISON STREET
City
NORTH PRAIRIE
State
WI
ZIP
53153
Mailing
200 NORTH HARRISON STREET, NORTH PRAIRIE, WI 53153
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333922
Employees
19
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    (a)  The employer did not ensure all forklift operators were trained to have the knowledge and skills necessary to operate the forklifts safely.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $825
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jul 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):      (a) In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, an Ellis horizontal bandsaw did not have the unused portion of the blade guarded exposing employees to struck-by hazards.      (b)  In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, a Scotchman hydraulic ironworker was not equipped with point of operation guards, devices, awareness barriers, and/or adjustable restricters during use of the angle iron, shear blade, or punch stations exposing employees to struck-by hazards.      (c)  In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, a hydraulic ironworker was not equipped with point of operation guards, devices, awareness barriers, and/or adjustable restricters during use of the punch station exposing employees to struck-by hazards.      (d)  In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, the Summit Shear had a guard opening of approximately 7/8" in some areas and between 1 7/8" and 2 1/8" in other which allowed access to the hold downs and shear blade exposing employees to amputation hazards.     (e)  In the Shipping/Receiving Bay, the press brake had inadequate guarding at the point of operation exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    (a) In the Fabrication Bay, an 8 in bench grinder had the tongue guard on the right side adjusted to approximately 5/8" exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $825
  • · Z (S) $1360

1915.134 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1915.134(b): Work rests were not kept a distance not to exceed 1/8 inch from the surface of the wheel.    (a)  In the Fabrication Bay, an 8 in bench grinder had a work rest on the left side adjusted to approximately 3/4" exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:     (a)  In Building 2; the crane hoist 220V 30 Amp disconnect had a missing knockout exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.     (b)  In Building 2; the service from main fuse box 220V 100 Amp disconnect had two missing knockouts exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1360

1915.51 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.51(f)(2): Employees who were welding, cutting or heating were not protected by suitable eye protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 1915.153.    (a) In the Fabrication Bay, employees performing tack welding operations were using their hand to shield from the welding operations exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $825
  • · Z (S) $1360

1915.56 E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.56(e): Arc welding and cutting operations were not shielded by noncombustible or flameproof screens to protect employees in the vicinity from the direct rays of the arc.     (a)  In the Fabrication Area, employees working in near proximity of the welders were not protected by welding curtains exposing them to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1360

1915.89 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jul 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $825 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.89(q)(1):   The employer did not ensure that the audit was performed by an authorized employee other than the one(s) currently using the energy-control procedure being reviewed.    (a)  The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection at least annually to ensure the procedures and authorized employees were being followed and to correct any deficiencies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $825
  • · Z (S) $1360

1915.112 C01 I

Other-than-serious 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.112(c)(1)(i): Employer did not ensure chain and chain slings have permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer indicating the recommended safe working load for the type(s) of hitch(es) used.    (a)  In the Assembly Area, several chain slings were not tagged with the size, grade, rated capacity, or reach exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1360

1915.112 C02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1915.112(c)(2): Chain inspections did not include inspection for wear, defective welds, deformation, and increase in length or stretch.    (a)  In the Assembly Area, the chain sling were not inspected at least once every three months exposing employees to struck-by hazards.  Several chain slings used for painting had bent washers, defective links.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.304 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2014
Abate by
Jun 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(a)(2): Grounded conductors were attached to terminals or leads so as to reverse designated polarity:  (a) In Building 2, an outlet used to power the exhaust fan and fluorescent light had the hot and neutral conductors reversed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View D & D Products Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339562696.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.