Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: CANTEX INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CANTEX INC. in 202 PROGRESS RD, AUBURNDALE, FL 33823 (NAICS 326122). OSHA activity number 339566150.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cantex INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cantex INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CANTEX INC.
Site address
202 PROGRESS RD
City
AUBURNDALE
State
FL
ZIP
33823
Mailing
202 PROGRESS RD, AUBURNDALE, FL 33823
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326122
Employees
124
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level:   a. At the establishment, employees were exposed to an 8 foot fall hazard, in that, there was no intermediate or mid rail on the hopper platforms, on or about 01/28/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   a. At the establishment employees were exposed to an amputation hazard, in that, while using the Balador Relance drill press no guard was present, on or about 01/28/2014     b. At the establishment, employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, in that, the drive rollers and gears on labeling machine were not guarded, on or about 01/28/2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:   a. At the establishment, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard, in that, the Balador Reliance drill press was not secured to the floor, on or about 01/28/2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1377
  • · Z (S) $2295

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:   a. At the establishment, employees were exposed to an amputation hazard, in that, the work rest on the Wissota bench grinder was 1/2 inch from the wheel, on or about 01/28/2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1377
  • · Z (S) $2295

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $540 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Services, feeders, and branch circuits. Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or over current device, shall be legibly marked to indicate its purpose, unless located and arranged so the purpose is evident.   a. At the establishment, breaker panel switches in BP1 and BP2 were not labeled, on or about 01/28/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $540
  • · Z (O) $900

1910.305 G02 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $540 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    a. At the establishment, employees were exposed to a electrocution hazard,in that, the flexible cord on the Baldor Reliance drill press, was spliced with electrical tape, on or about 01/28/14.   b. At the establishment, employees were exposed to a shock hazard, in that, the flexible cord on the labeling machine was spliced with caps, on or about 01/28/2014
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $540
  • · Z (O) $900

View Cantex INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339566150.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.