Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: CONIN FRAMING GROUP, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONIN FRAMING GROUP, INC. in 3722 CROSSVIEW DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32224 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339576662.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Conin Framing Group, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conin Framing Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3722 CROSSVIEW DRIVE
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32224
Mailing
10960 BEACH BOULEVARD LOT 670, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32246
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $2,640
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access:  a. On or about Febraury 6, 2014, the Werner extension ladder used to access and egress the top of a structure, did not extend 3-foot above the eave, exposing an employee to a 10-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2640
  • · Z (S) $2640

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $10,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Conin Framing Group, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 895671, citation 01, item number 001, issued on May 29, 2013, with respect to a workplace at 12934 Shirewood Lane, Jacksonville, Florida 32224. The final order date was June 19, 2013.    Conin Framing Group, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 951877, citation 02, item number 001, issued on January 30, 2014 with respect to a workplace at 12565 Dewhurst Circle, Jacksonville, Florida 32246.The final order date was February 21, 2014.    29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a. On or about February 6, 2014, on top of a structure, an employee using a Hitachi pneumatic air nail gun was not wearing safety glasses, exposing himself to being hit by nails or flying debris.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $2000
  • · Z (R) $10000

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,280 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Conin Framing Group, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 895671, citation 01, item number 002, issued on May 29, 2013, with respect to a workplace at 12934 Shirewood Lane, Jacksonville, Florida 32224. The final order date was June 19, 2013.    29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):     a. On or about February 6, 2014, on top of a structure, an employee performing framing operations was not protected from a 10-foot 7-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $2000
  • · Z (R) $5280

View Conin Framing Group, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339576662.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.