HOLLIS, NH —
OSHA Inspection: DIAMOND CASTING AND MACHINE COMPANY, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DIAMOND CASTING AND MACHINE COMPANY, INC. in 95 PROCTOR HILL RD., HOLLIS, NH 03049 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 339582298.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIAMOND CASTING AND MACHINE COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 95 PROCTOR HILL RD.
- City
- HOLLIS
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03049
- Mailing
- PO BOX 420, HOLLIS, NH 03049
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from molten metal: a. Employees were not protected from burns while adding metal scrap to the crucible of molten aluminum without the use of a face shield.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.135 A01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects: a. Site - Employees were not protected from struck-by hazards associated with swinging loads while using an overhead crane to change out dies without the use of head protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. Tool Room - Employees were not protected from amputation hazards when the rotating chuck of a Mazak lathe was not adequately guarded. b. Tool Room - Employees were not protected from flying chips while operating two Bridgeport vertical milling machines without effective chip guarding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections: a. Site - Employees were not protected from amputation hazards when the spindle end of a Dayton bench grinder was not guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: a. Site - Employees were not protected from amputation hazards when work rests were not provided on a Dayton bench grinder.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: a. Site - Employees were not protected from struck-by hazards when a Dayton bench grinder was not equipped with an adjustable tongue guard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: a. Tool Room - Employees were not protected from puncture hazards when compressed air, set at approximately 40 p.s.i., was used for cleaning purposes. b. CNC Area - Employees were not protected from puncture hazards when compressed air, set at approximately 55 p.s.i., was used for cleaning purposes.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,025 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: a. Site - Employees who perform electrical work were not provided with electrical safe work practice training.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1025
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: a. Site - Employees performing electrical work were not provided with personal protective equipment to include but not limited to face shield and voltage rated gloves.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a. Site - The employer did not have powered industrial trucks inspected daily before being placed in service.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Diamond Casting and Machine Company, INC.
View Diamond Casting and Machine Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339582298.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.