Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EGER PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EGER PRODUCTS, INC. in 1132 FERRIS ROAD, AMELIA, OH 45102 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 339584104.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eger Products, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eger Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EGER PRODUCTS, INC.
Site address
1132 FERRIS ROAD
City
AMELIA
State
OH
ZIP
45102
Mailing
1132 FERRIS ROAD, AMELIA, OH 45102
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Dec 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a)    Eger Products, Inc. failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 for hazards associated with; 5) documentation showing all employees have been trained on the Frekote.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $900

1910.106 E06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors from sources such as open flames; lightning; smoking; cutting and welding; hot surfaces; frictional heat; static, electrical, and mechanical sparks; spontaneous ignition, including heat-producing chemical reactions; and radiant heat:    a) The 55 gallon drums of frekote (FP 23°F, Category 2 flammable liquid) in the flammable liquid storage room were not gounded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.106 E06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C), were dispensed into containers without the nozzle and container being electrically interconnected.  a)  When employees transferred FreKote (FP 23°F, Category 2 flammable liquid) from the 55 gallon drum to 1 gallon portable containers they did not have the nozzle of the manual pump interconnected to the portable containers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.106 E02 IV B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(b): Where flammable liquids are used or handled, except in closed containers, there were no means provided to dispose promptly and safely of leakage or spills:      a) One gallon metal cans containing FreKote (FP 23°F, Category 2 flammable liquid) were left open while in use at each rotator operator work station with no means to safely contain leaks and/or spills.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    a)  Employees working with laquer thinner, dibasic ester, frekote and other hazardous chemicals were not required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 50 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    a) The one gallon metal cans containing Frekote (FP 23°F, Category 2 flammable liquid) did not have the identity of the chemical on the container.     b) The plastic squeeze bottle containing thinner in the ink room was labeled as containing both thinner and isopropyl alcohol.    c) The plastic pan in the ink room containing dibasic ester did not have the identity of the chemical on the container.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:   a)  The pan of dibasic ester in the ink room did not have the hazard warning marked on it.  b)  The squeeze bottle of isopropyl alcohol in the ink room did not have the hazard warning marked on it.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): 29 CFR 1919.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:    a) Employees working with chemicals, such as but not limited to, FreKote (FP 23°F, Category 2 flammable liquid) had not been trained on the hazards of the chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  a) A written certification of a hazard assessment had not been completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Eger Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339584104.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.