MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: CMG DEVELOPMENT LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CMG DEVELOPMENT LLC in 350 NE 6TH AVENUE, MIAMI, FL 33179 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 339587750.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CMG DEVELOPMENT LLC
- Site address
- 350 NE 6TH AVENUE
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33179
- Mailing
- 3500 N. STATE ROAD 7 300-10, LAUDERDALE LAKES, FL 33319
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238350
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On or about 2/10/2014, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to flying particles while using a circular saw without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about 2/10/2014, at the above addressed jobsite, three employees were exposed to fall hazards while conducting carpentry work without having a fall protection system in place. Instance 1: Two employees installing 4 x 8 plywood onto the roof trusses. Instance 2: One employee installing 2x4's on a small roof canopy.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about 2/10/2014, at the above addressed jobsite, three employees were exposed to fall hazards while using an extension ladder where the side rails did not extend at least 3' from the 2nd floor landing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B17
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(17): Fixed ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, or corroded components, were not withdrawn from service until repaired: On or about 2/10/2014, at the above addressed jobsite, three employees were exposed to fall hazards while using an extension ladder that was not withdrawn from service due to its missing safety shoes.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- May 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use: On or about 2/10/2014, at the above addressed jobsite, a Werner extension ladder was not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis whereas the ladder had missing safety shoes and was not extended 3' or more above the 2nd floor landing. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at CMG Development LLC
View CMG Development LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238350)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339587750.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.