PACIFIC, MO —
OSHA Inspection: CLAYTON CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CLAYTON CORPORATION in 307 INTERGRAM DR., PACIFIC, MO 63069 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 339588949.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLAYTON CORPORATION
- Site address
- 307 INTERGRAM DR.
- City
- PACIFIC
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63069
- Mailing
- 307 INTERGRAM DR., PACIFIC, MO 63069
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326150
- Employees
- 70
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E02 IV C
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,400 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(c): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degrees F (37.8 degress C), were not used where there were no open flames or other sources of ignition within the possible path of vapor travel: a. In the testing room testing booth, an ignition source, such as static electricity, was not eliminated or controlled when spraying a flammble liquid aerosol. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $5400
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors: a. In the testing room testing booth, an ignition source, such as static electricity, was not eliminated or controlled when spraying a flammable liquid aerosol, such as, but not limited to, anti-static floor mats, employee grounding. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119: a. Where a liquefied petroleum gas was stored under pressure in tanks and at quantities exceeding 10,000 lbs., a process hazard analysis, according to the requirements of 1910.119, was not developed, conducted, and documented. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.119 G01 I
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer did not train each employee in an overview of the process (process safety management process): a. Where a liquefied petroleum gas was stored under pressure in tanks and at quantities exceeding 10,000 lbs., and piped into a filling room, all training requirements and documentation had not been completed. (Note: the training requirement includes all aspects of the PSM (process safety management) program, such as operating procedures (as described in the standard, 1910.119(f)(1) through (4)), maintenance and mechanical integrity, management of change, as well as other information requirements such as the employee participation plan.) Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1350
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 H03
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv): a. Such as for hazards in the testing room testing booth, where flammable liquids were sprayed, training did not include ignition sources, static electricity hazards, booth grounding, and sash height placement. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $3600
More inspections at Clayton Corporation
View Clayton Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326150)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339588949.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.