Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CLAYTON CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CLAYTON CORPORATION in 307 INTERGRAM DR., PACIFIC, MO 63069 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 339588949.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Clayton Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Clayton Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CLAYTON CORPORATION
Site address
307 INTERGRAM DR.
City
PACIFIC
State
MO
ZIP
63069
Mailing
307 INTERGRAM DR., PACIFIC, MO 63069
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326150
Employees
70
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E02 IV C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(c): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degrees F (37.8 degress C), were not used where there were no open flames or other sources of ignition within the possible path of vapor travel:    a. In the testing room testing booth, an ignition source, such as static electricity, was not eliminated or controlled when spraying a flammble liquid aerosol.    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.106 E06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors:  a. In the testing room testing booth, an ignition source, such as static electricity, was not eliminated or controlled when spraying a flammable liquid aerosol, such as, but not limited to, anti-static floor mats, employee grounding.  Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119:    a. Where a liquefied petroleum gas was stored under pressure in tanks and at quantities exceeding 10,000 lbs., a process hazard analysis, according to the requirements of 1910.119, was not developed, conducted, and documented.    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.119 G01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer did not train each employee in an overview of the process (process safety management process):    a. Where a liquefied petroleum gas was stored under pressure in tanks and at quantities exceeding 10,000 lbs., and piped into a filling room, all training requirements and documentation had not been completed.  (Note: the training requirement includes all aspects of the PSM (process safety management) program, such as operating procedures (as described in the standard, 1910.119(f)(1) through (4)), maintenance and mechanical integrity, management of change, as well as other information requirements such as the employee participation plan.)    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv):    a. Such as for hazards in the testing room testing booth, where flammable liquids were sprayed, training did not include ignition sources, static electricity hazards, booth grounding, and sash height placement.    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

View Clayton Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339588949.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.