BROOKLYN, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: ARCTIC GLACIER U.S.A., INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARCTIC GLACIER U.S.A., INC. in 335 MOFFAT ST., BROOKLYN, NY 11237 (NAICS 312113). OSHA activity number 339610354.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARCTIC GLACIER U.S.A., INC.
- Site address
- 335 MOFFAT ST.
- City
- BROOKLYN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11237
- Mailing
- 363 BLOOMFIELD AVE., MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 312113
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
21 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.253 B02 III
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(iii): Empty cylinders did not have their valves closed while in storage:(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)(NUMBER AND TYPE OF GAS CYLINDERS INVOLVED)
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $7000
1910.253 B05 II H
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(5)(ii)(H): Valves of empty cylinders were not closed:(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $7000
1910.36 B01
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(b)(1): At least two exit routes were not available in a workplace to permit prompt evacuation of employees and other building occupants during an emergency, except as allowed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. a) The facility: Two exits were not available in the workplace to permit prompt evacuation of employees and other building occupants during an emergency. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employees were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge. a) Exit route door to the north of the workshop and into the office area: Employees were not able to open an exit route door from inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge. The exit route door was locked which requires a key to open. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet). a) 2nd floor, door to the roof: The doorway to the roof along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation. There was no sign to identify and indicate the doors actual use. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.119 C02
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(2): Employers did not consult with employees and their representatives on the conduct and development of process hazards analyses and on the development of the other elements of process safety management in this standard. At the facility: a) The employer did not consult with the plant manager and employees on the conduct and development of process hazards analyses and on the development of the other elements of process safety management in this standard. Employees are affected by emergency evacuation procedures, but were not involved in emergency planning and response. On or about 03/04/14 b) The plant manager oversees the anhydrous ammonia refrigeration systems when the plant engineer is not on site during off season and when the systems are not running, but he was not involved in process hazard analyses and other elements of process safety management. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.119 D02 I E
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(E): Information concerning the technology of the process did not include: An evaluation of the consequences of deviations, including those affecting the safety and health of employees. a) The facility: The employer did not do an evaluation of the consequences of deviations from using process safety information concerning the construction, operation, maintenance, and replacement of equipment such as but not limited to the reciprocating compressors, of the ammonia refrigeration systems. For example: the employer did not evaluate the consequences of deviation if safe upper and lower limits of process equipment were exceeded. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 D03 I D
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include: Relief system design and design basis. a) The facility: The employer provided data and specifications for the safety relief system in the process, but did not explain the design basis for the relief system in their process safety information. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.119 G03
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(3): The employer did not ascertain that each employee involved in operating a process has received and understood the training required by this paragraph. The employer did not prepare a record which contains the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training. a) The facility: Frantz Saieh, who is the plant engineer that inspects, maintains, and operates the ammonia refrigeration systems, received refrigeration engineer training from FDNY. FDNY certificate did not contain information on the means used to verify that the employee understood the training on site specific ammonia refrigeration systems in the plant. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · D (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.120 Q06
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6): Employees who participate, or are expected to participate, in emergency response, were not given training before they take part in actual emergency operations on an incident. a) The facility: The employer expects the plant engineer to participate in emergency response operations by entering the engine room to investigate and control a release of anhydrous ammonia. The plant engineer was not given training. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc. a) 1st floor, ice bin #2: An employee who was working with ice bin #2 was exposed to the rotating auger inside the ice bin. The guard that protects employees from falling into the ice bin and the auger was broken. On or about 03/14/14. b) 1st floor, packaging lines 1 - 4: Employees were using packaging machines to package ice cubes in plastic bags. The packaging machines have exposed moving parts, which employees are exposed to while working. On or about 03/14/14.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machines designed for a fixed location were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving. a) 1st floor, workshop: An employee used a drill press to drill flat metal sheets. The drill press was designed for a fixed location and was not securely anchored to prevent it from moving. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $4400
- · Z (S) $4400
1910.253 B02 IV
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(iv): Valve protection caps, where cylinder is designed to accept a cap, were not in place, hand-tight, except when cylinders are in use or connected for use. a) 1st floor, Well Room: Valve protection caps were not in place on oxygen and acetylene cylinders which were designed to accept caps and were in storage. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $7000
- · C (S) $4400
- · Z (S) $4400
1910.305 E02
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour. a) 1st floor, Well Room: Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from acetylene gas cylinders. Oxygen and acetylene cylinders were stored adjacent to each other. On or about 03/04/14. 29 CFR 1910.305(e)(2): Switches, circuit breakers, and switchboards installed in wet locations were not enclosed in weatherproof enclosures. a) 1st floor, South of packaging lines 1 - 4: The main electrical switches for packaging machines were installed in a wet location where ice cubes and melted ice water dripped from the ice feed for packaging machines to the top of the switches. Electrical switches were not enclosed in weatherproof enclosures and corroded severely in a wet environment. On or about 03/14/14.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $7000
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.305 G01 IV
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Flexible cords and cables were used: Where run through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors. a) 1st floor, workshop entrance: Power cord of a UV light, which was installed in the stairway outside the workshop, ran through holes in walls and was routed to an electrical outlet inside the workshop. On or about 03/04/14.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $4400
- · Z (S) $4400
1910.119 C03
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(3): Employers did not provide to employees and their representatives access to process hazard analyses and to all other information required to be developed under this standard. a) The facility: The plant manager oversees the anhydrous ammonia refrigeration systems when the plant engineer is not on site during off season and when the systems are not running, but he does not have access to process hazard analyses and process and instrument diagrams when the plant engineer is not on site. On or about 03/04/14. 1st REPEAT Arctic Glacier Inc. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT, OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119(c)(3), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 623559, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 7a, ISSUED ON 02/19/2013, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 10/29/2013, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 500 Fenimore Street, Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $0
- · C (R) $27500
- · Z (R) $27500
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $38,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. a) Engine Room: The employer did not document that the engine room, where the ammonia refrigeration systems are located, complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as but not limited to: 2009 International Mechanical Codes, System Application Requirements (Section 1104.2), which required that "all components containing the refrigerant shall be located either outdoors or in a machinery room where the quantity of refrigerant in an independent circuit of system exceeds the amounts shown in Table 1103.1", which is 0.022 lbs/1000 cubic feet for ammonia. On or about 03/04/14. b) Engine Room: The employer did not document that the physical barriers used to protect the ammonia refrigeration systems complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as but not limited to: 2009 International Mechanical Codes, General Protection (Section 1101.3), which required that "Any portion of a refrigeration system that is subject to physical damage shall be protected in an approved manner." On or about 03/04/14. c) Rooftop of Building: The employer did not document that the pressure relief vent line, which extended approximately 8.5 feet above the roof, complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as but not limited to: 2009 International Mechanical Codes, Termination of Relief Devices (Section 1105.7), which required that "Pressure relief devices, fusible plugs and purge systems located within the machinery room shall terminate outside of the structure at a location not less than 15 feet (4572 mm) above the adjoining grade level and not less than 20 feet (6096 mm) from any window, ventilation opening or exit." On or about 03/04/14. 1st REPEAT Arctic Glacier Inc. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT, OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 623559, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 8b, ISSUED ON 02/19/2013, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 10/29/2013, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 500 Fenimore Street, Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $0
- · C (R) $38500
- · Z (R) $38500
1910.119 F01 II B
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B): Operating procedures did not include steps required to correct or avoid deviation: a) Ammonia Reciprocating Compressors: Operating procedures for all ammonia reciprocating compressors on site did not include steps required to correct or avoid deviation from operating limits. On or about 03/04/14. b) Ammonia Evaporative Condensers: Operating procedures for all ammonia evaporative condensers on site did not include steps required to correct or avoid deviation from operating limits. On or about 03/04/14. c) Ammonia Suction Accumulators: Operating procedures for all ammonia suction accumulators on site did not include steps required to correct or avoid deviation from operating limits. On or about 03/04/14. d) High Pressure Receivers: Operating procedures for all high pressure receivers on site did not include steps required to correct or avoid deviation from operating limits. On or about 03/04/14. e) Ice Makers: Operating procedures for all ice makers on site did not include steps required to correct or avoid deviation from operating limits. On or about 03/04/14. 1st REPEAT Arctic Glacier Inc. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT, OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 623559, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 10f, ISSUED ON 02/19/2013, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 10/29/2013, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 500 Fenimore Street, Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $0
- · C (R) $27500
- · Z (R) $27500
1910.119 F01 III B
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for the precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment: a) Ammonia Reciprocating Compressors: Operating procedures for evacuation of ammonia vapor from the equipment and re-introduction of ammonia vapor to the equipment were unclear, in that they failed to specify what personal protective equipment is required to be worn to perform these operations, and the availability of the required personal protective equipment. On or about 03/04/14. b) Ammonia Evaporative Condensers: Operating procedures for evacuation of ammonia vapor from the equipment and re-introduction of ammonia vapor to the equipment were unclear, in that they failed to specify what personal protective equipment is required to be worn to perform these operations, and the availability of the required personal protective equipment. On or about 03/04/14. c) Ammonia Suction Accumulators: Operating procedures for evacuation of ammonia vapor from the equipment and re-introduction of ammonia vapor to the equipment were unclear, in that they failed to specify what personal protective equipment is required to be worn to perform these operations, and the availability of the required personal protective equipment. On or about 03/04/14. d) High Pressure Receivers: Operating procedures for evacuation of ammonia vapor from the equipment and re-introduction of ammonia vapor to the equipment were unclear, in that they failed to specify what personal protective equipment is required to be worn to perform these operations, and the availability of the required personal protective equipment. On or about 03/04/14. e) Ice Makers: Operating procedures for evacuation of ammonia vapor from the equipment and re-introduction of ammonia vapor to the equipment were unclear, in that they failed to specify what personal protective equipment is required to be worn to perform these operations, and the availability of the required personal protective equipment. On or about 03/04/14. f) The facility: The employer did not develop and implement written emergency operating procedures that provided clear instructions to plant engineer, who is required to respond and handle ammonia releases, about precautions necessary to prevent exposure while responding to ammonia releases, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment. On or about 03/04/14. 1st REPEAT Arctic Glacier Inc. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT, OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 623559, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 10g, ISSUED ON 02/19/2013, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 10/29/2013, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 500 Fenimore Street, Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $0
- · C (R) $27500
- · Z (R) $27500
1910.119 J04 IV
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The documentation for each inspection and test did not identify the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test. a) The facility: For each inspection and test performed on process equipment, the employer did not document on the "Ammonia Refrigeration Mechanical Integrity Checklist" the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test. On or about 03/04/14. 2nd REPEAT Arctic Glacier Inc. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT, OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 314235276, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 4b, ISSUED ON 11/25/2011, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 01/07/2012, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 410 Bethel Avenue, Aston, PA 19014; AND IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 623559, CITATION NUMBER 2, ITEM NUMBER 1c, ISSUED ON 02/19/2013, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 10/29/2013, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 500 Fenimore Street, Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $0
- · C (R) $55000
- · Z (R) $55000
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): Working space required by this standard was used for storage. a) 1st floor, Well Room: The required working space for operating electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage. Oxygen cylinders, Acetylene cylinders, Freon tanks, and other items were stored in the working space for electric cabinet and control boxes. On or about 03/04/14. 1st REPEAT Arctic Glacier Inc. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT, OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 623559, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 15a, ISSUED ON 02/19/2013, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 10/29/2013, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 500 Fenimore Street, Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $0
- · C (R) $27500
- · Z (R) $27500
More inspections at Arctic Glacier U.S.A., INC.
View Arctic Glacier U.S.A., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 312113)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339610354.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.