OSHA Inspection: COFFEYVILLE SEKTAM INC

Issued

Apr 10, 2014

Abate by

Jul 28, 2014

Penalty

Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:  The employer had not performed the annual inspection of the machine specific Lockout/Tagout Procedures within the last twelve months. Employees were exposed to potential hazards when performing Lockout/Tagout of the machine specific procedures.

Issued

Apr 10, 2014

Abate by

Jun 20, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): 1904.32(a)(2).  The employer did not create, certify and post an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 Log.  The employer had not created, certified or posted the OSHA Form 300A as of the date of the inspection.

Issued

Apr 10, 2014

Abate by

Jul 7, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  The employer has not developed a hazard communication program that explains the labels on shipping containers and the safety data sheets, including the order of information and how the employee could obtain and use the hazard information. Throughout the facility where employees were using lubricants, fuel gasses, and cutting gasses without having a hazard communication program in place that explains the revised labeling elements on shipping containers or the revised safety data sheet format.