RICHLAND, MS —
OSHA Inspection: JOE GUSTAVIS MASONARY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOE GUSTAVIS MASONARY in 911 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, RICHLAND, MS 39218 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339612434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOE GUSTAVIS MASONARY
- Site address
- 911 TOWN CENTER DRIVE
- City
- RICHLAND
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39218
- Mailing
- P.O.BOX 408, HAZLEHURST, MS 39083
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,836 · Current $918 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as follows: (a) Back of Building - On or about February 28, 2014 employees were exposed to a fall hazard due to a scaffold not being fully decked or planked. One deck was not installed on the scaffold resulting in a 16.5 inch gap where the employee could fall 11.6 feet onto concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $918
- — Z (S) $1836
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. (a) Back of Building - On or about February 28, 2014 employees were exposed to a fall hazard while standing on a scaffold 11.6 feet above concrete with no guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2520
1926.452 W01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,836 · Current $918 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(1): Scaffolds were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, to prevent racking or collapse of the scaffold and to secure vertical members together laterally so as to automatically square and align the vertical members. Scaffolds shall be plumb, level, and squared. All brace connections were not secured. (a) Back of Building - On or about February 28, 2014 employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working on a scaffold that was missing cross-braces on the inside. Employees were exposed to falling 11.6 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $918
- — Z (S) $1836
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces shall not be used as a means of access. (a) Back of Building - On or about February 28, 2014 employees were exposed to a fall hazard due to scaffold having a ladder that did not reach within 2 feet of the ground. The access point was 78 inches above concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity. (a) Back of Building - On or about February 28, 2014 employees were exposed to several fall hazards due to the fact the scaffold had a damaged platform and boards. Scaffold was not inspected for visible damage prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at JOE Gustavis Masonary
View JOE Gustavis Masonary's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339612434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.