Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAURICIO GONZALEZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MAURICIO GONZALEZ in 223 S. BODIN ST., HINSDALE, IL 60521 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339613960.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mauricio Gonzalez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mauricio Gonzalez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAURICIO GONZALEZ
Site address
223 S. BODIN ST.
City
HINSDALE
State
IL
ZIP
60521
Mailing
2809 S. CRISTIANA AVE, CHICAGO, IL 60623
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):                             The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    Mauricio Gonzalez dba Mauricio Gonzalez failed to submit documents to OSHA verifying that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:    Citation Number                     Item Number                           Abatement Date  01                                            01a                                            03/28/2014 01                                            01 b                                            03/28/2014 01                                            04                                                03/28/2014    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:     Mauricio Gonzalez dba Mauricio Gonzalez. failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                           Abatement Date  01                                02                                                        03/28/2014  01                                03                                                        03/218/2014      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  On or about March 6, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate hazards present at the job site in accordance with OSHA regulations.   Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about March 6, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall while working on a residential property and were not provided with training to recognize and minimize the hazards associated with falls.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about March 6, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working below employees performing residential roofing operations was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling material and debris.   Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.300 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(2): Moving part(s) of equipment exposed to contact by employees or which otherwise created a hazard, were not guarded:  On or about March 6, 2014, an employee operated an air compressor missing a guard around the motor, exposing the employee to an amputation hazard.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.9(C).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  On or about March 6, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations from a temporary elevated work platform, nineteen (19) feet four (4) inches above the ground, were exposed to injuries from falls due to the lack of guardrails.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about March 6, 2014, employees performing residential roofing operations, twenty-three (23) feet three (3) inches above the ground, were not protected from falling, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.  There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  On or about March 6, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3) feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.  There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Mauricio Gonzalez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339613960.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.