Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WENTHE-DAVIDSON ENGINEERING CO.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of WENTHE-DAVIDSON ENGINEERING CO. in 16300 WEST ROGERS DRIVE, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 339627341.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wenthe-Davidson Engineering CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wenthe-Davidson Engineering CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16300 WEST ROGERS DRIVE
City
NEW BERLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53151
Mailing
16300 WEST ROGERS DRIVE, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332313
Employees
167
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2014
Abate by
Aug 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):     The procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following:    (a)  Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while performing routine maintenance (wiping down rollers and roller table) on roller machines and the employer did not ensure procedures were developed to control potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2014
Abate by
Aug 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by:    (a)  Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while operating the shop built press (Machine #3000-4) and the employer did not ensure that the moving parts below the point of operation were properly guarded.      (b)  Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while operating the Cincinnati Shear (Machine #200 & Serial #43421) and the employer did not ensure that employees were protected for the hold downs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2014
Abate by
Aug 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) (DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY)    (a) Employees were exposed to amputations hazards while working on rollers (Arcotech Model #LD-1224 & Serial #0499-1200H-169) and the employer did not ensure that employees were protected for the point of operation.    (b) Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on Press #508 and the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was properly guarded.      (c) Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on Press #588-1 and the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was properly guarded.      (d) Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on Press #588-2 and the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was properly guarded.     (e) Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on Press #804 and the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was properly guarded.      (f) Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on Press #3000-1 and the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was properly guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $6300

View Wenthe-Davidson Engineering CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339627341.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.