Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CAG GROUP, LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CAG GROUP, LLC in 611 E. 133RD STREET, BRONX, NY 10454 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339629933.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CAG Group, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CAG Group, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CAG GROUP, LLC
Site address
611 E. 133RD STREET
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10454
Mailing
1510 SURPRISE STREET, ELMONT, NY 11003
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.50 G

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.50(g): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body was not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor    a) The employee was spraying monokote and not provided with an eye wash.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.95(a): "Application." Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:    On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor    a) The employees were spraying monokote and not provided the necessary personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used. Crossbraces shall not be used as a means of access:    On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor    a) The employee climbed on the frame of the scaffold for access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 F05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(5): Scaffolds were moved horizontally while employees were on them. The scaffold was not designed by a registered professional engineer specifically for such movement and the provisions for mobile scaffolds 1926.452(w) were not followed:    On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor    a) The employee was spraying monokote on the beams. The scaffold was being moved while he was on it.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner:  On or about 3rd Floor, North Side  a) The wheel locks had wire around them to keep them in the open position. The employee was working on the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers:    On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor, North Side    a) The scaffold was at the edge, while the employee was spraying monokote on the beams. He was exposed to an approximate 40' fall hazard to the outside of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(c): When the employer has reason to believe that an employee lacks the skill or understanding needed for safe work involving the erection, use or dismantling of scaffolds, the employer will retrain each such employee so that the requisite proficiency is regained:   On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor  a) The employees needed to be re-trained as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:  On or about 3/12/2014, 3rd Floor  a) The employees were not provided a written hazard communication program as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View CAG Group, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339629933.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.