Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NOR-RAL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NOR-RAL, INC. in 164 HICKORY SPRINGS INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, CANTON, GA 30115 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 339644353.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nor-Ral, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nor-Ral, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NOR-RAL, INC.
Site address
164 HICKORY SPRINGS INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
CANTON
State
GA
ZIP
30115
Mailing
164 HICKORY SPRINGS INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, CANTON, GA 30115
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336413
Employees
47
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Nor-Ral, Inc. - On or about March 2014, employees were required to used negative pressure half mask respirators to prevent exposure to smoke inhalation due to a fire.  The employees had not been fit tested or medically evaluated for the negative pressure respirator.  Emergency respirators were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3080

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used:   (a) Nor-Ral, Inc. - On or about March 2014, employees were required to used negative pressure half mask respirators to prevent exposure to smoke inhalation due to a fire.  The employees had not been fit tested or medically evaluated for the negative pressure respirator.  Emergency respirators were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Sep 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $3,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0691

29 CFR 1910.1026(h)(1): A hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI); however, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and/or did not ensure that employees used such clothing and equipment:  (a) Nor-Ral, Inc. - On or about March 27, 2014, an employee mixing paint was exposed to a splash hazard to the face and was not required to wear face protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3080

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Oct 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,700 · Current $2,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0691

Under section 17(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted (TWA) average exposure for each employee exposed to Chromium (VI):    Nor-Ral, Inc. - on or about March 27, 2014, an initial determination for exposure to Chromium (VI) was not performed where an employee performing painting operations was exposed to Chromium VI (CrVI) at 4.8 micrograms per cubic meter as an 8-hour TWA, which is above the action level of 2.5 micrograms per cubic meter as an 8-hour TWA .  The employee's exposure was monitored for 60 minutes while mixing and painting, with the remaining 420 minutes assumed as zero exposure. On November 5, 2013, the employer conducted total Chromium monitoring instead of Chromium (VI) monitoring.       In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (R) $7700

1910.1026 D02 III

Deleted Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Oct 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0691

Under section 17(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(iii): Monitoring revealed employee exposures to chromium (VI) to be at or above the action level; however, the employer did not perform periodic monitoring at least every six months:  Nor-Ral, Inc. - on or about March 26, 2014, the employer did not perform periodic monitoring at least every six months for exposure to Chromium (VI) for an employee performing painting operations that was exposed to Chromium VI (CrVI) at 4.8 micrograms per cubic meter as an 8-hour TWA, which is above the action level of 2.5 micrograms per cubic meter as an 8-hour TWA .  The employee's exposure was monitored for 60 minutes while mixing and painting, with the remaining 420 minutes assumed as zero exposure.  On November 5, 2013, the employer conducted total Chromium monitoring instead of Chromium (VI) monitoring.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $0
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.1026 I01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Oct 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,700 · Current $7,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0691

Under section 17(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and 29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(1): The employer did not provide change rooms, in conformance with the Sanitation standard, 29 CFR 1910.141, for employees who were required to change their clothes to use protective clothing and equipment for chromium (VI) exposures:  a) Nor-Ral, Inc. - on or about March 26, 2014, an employee was exposed to Chromium VI (CrVI) during mixing and painting.  A wipe sample of the employee's shirt worn under protective clothing showed evidence of hexavalent chromium exposure of 0.35 micrograms and 0.15 micrograms.  b)Nor-Ral, Inc. - on or about March 26, 2014, employees  are exposed to cross contamination in that the clean and dirty lockers were located inside the Chromium mixing room.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $7000
  • · Z (R) $7700

View Nor-Ral, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339644353.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.